‘Games of Thrones’ petition to remake final season nears 500,000 signatures | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

‘Games of Thrones’ petition to remake final season nears 500,000 signatures

Patrick Varine
1166249_web1_1124076-5efe249c5aca4de9a4b80a566ffe490d
Helen Sloan/HBO
This image released by HBO shows from left, Nathalie Emmanuel, Emilia Clarke and Conleth Hill in a scene from “Game of Thrones,” that aired Sunday, May 5, 2019.
1166249_web1_gtr-ThronesPetition-051719
Screenshot: Change.org
A screenshot shows the Change.org petition to “Remake Game of Thrones Season 8 with competent writers.” Criticism of the show’s final run has been swift and merciless at times.
1166249_web1_gtr-ThronesEp5Vid-051619
Jon Snow (Kit Harington) and Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage) in "The Bells," the penultimate episode of HBO’s "Game of Thrones."
1166249_web1_gtr-ThronesEp5-051219
Helen Sloan/HBO
Peter Dinklage as Tyrion Lannister in the penultimate episode of HBO’s "Game of Thrones."
1166249_web1_tv-thrones-preview-d0fb9d7a-6dae-11e9-8f44-e8d8bb1df986
Helen Sloan/HBO
Cersei Lannister on HBO’s “Game of Thrones.”
1166249_web1_1102049-9cf09e7b69e44715be0fae85ec173d59
Helen Sloan/HBO
This image released by HBO shows Maisie Williams in a scene from “Game of Thrones,” that aired Sunday, April 28, 2019. (Helen Sloan/HBO via AP)

***WARNING: SPOILERS THROUGH SEASON 8, EPISODE 5 OF ‘GAME OF THRONES’***

Nearly a half-million petitioners at Change.org are ready to mount a dragon and burn the final season of HBO’s “Game of Thrones” to the ground, very similar to what Daenerys Targaryen just did in the most recent episode, “The Bells.”

That decision — both by Dany and by the writers and show-runners — seems to have been the straw that broke the camel’s back when it comes to fan criticism of the show’s final run.

A Change.org petition with a goal of 500,000 signatures, “Remake Game of Thrones Season 8 with competent writers,” was getting pretty close. It had garnered 459,612 signatories as of Thursday afternoon, and you could literally watch that number tick upwards by the minute).

“David Benioff and D.B. Weiss have proven themselves to be woefully incompetent writers when they have no source material (i.e. the books) to fall back on,” the petition’s text reads. “This series deserves a final season that makes sense.”

Criticism of the eighth season has been swift and, in many cases, merciless, with longtime fans upset over inconsistency, the way time and travel is dealt with, character decisions and just about every other aspect of the show.

Here at the Trib, the “Thrones’n’at” panel has certainly had its fair share of criticism, primarily with the way the show, and particularly events that would normally take a full season to play out, have been compressed as the final two seasons were shortened from the typical 10 episodes, first to seven and this year to six.

Even shooting feature-movie-length episodes hasn’t stemmed the tide of fans savaging various elements of each week’s episode.

Critics seem to have gotten more vocal once the show began to outpace the source material, George R.R. Martin’s “Song of Ice and Fire” series. Martin has been working on the series’ sixth book, “The Winds of Winter,” since 2011, when the fifth book of the series, “A Dance with Dragons,” was published.

The final episode of the series will air Sunday, May 19.

Click here to view the petition.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.