Pierce Brosnan says he’s very open to lady James Bond, but likely won’t happen | TribLIVE.com

Pierce Brosnan says he’s very open to lady James Bond, but likely won’t happen

Frank Carnevale
Pierce Brosnan poses for photographers upon arrival at the premiere of the film ‘Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again’, in London, Monday, July 16, 2018.

Actor Pierce Brosnan said that playing James Bond is a career highlight, but thinks the iconic British spy should be played by a woman.

Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Brosnan said it was time for men to get out of the way.

“Yes!” Brosnan said to the magazine of the prospect of a female Bond. “I think we’ve watched the guys do it for the last 40 years. Get out of the way, guys, and put a woman up there. I think it would be exhilarating, it would be exciting.”

Daniel Craig resumed the role in the upcoming “No Time to Die” installment, set to open April 8, but there are rumors that Lashana Lynch could take over as the next 007, according to the magazine.

Bronson said of his four Bond movies, “James Bond has a certain significance and a deep pride. I will be asked about him until my dying days — it just goes with the territory. He’s a beloved character. I was honored to play the role and I rejuvenated a franchise that had been dormant.”

Brosnan also spoke about the Bond franchise at a press event at the Deauville Film Festival in France where he was getting an honor.

He said that as far as a change in the Bond character, he actually doesn’t believe it will happen with the current producers.

During a press event, he said, “I’m very open to a lady James Bond should they wish to do that. But I don’t think the family… The Broccolis (who own the characters and franchise) would let that happen… I don’t think that it will happen.”

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.