Review: After ‘Dark Phoenix,’ is it time for X-Men to move on? |

Review: After ‘Dark Phoenix,’ is it time for X-Men to move on?

I mean, whatever with the “X-Men” movies.

It’s hard to even rent an opinion on the discrete strengths and weaknesses of a franchise that has devolved to the point of “Dark Phoenix,” a lavishly brutal chore nearly as violent as the Wolverine movie “Logan,” and a movie featuring more death by impalement and whirling metal than all the “Saw” movies put together.

When the “Dark Phoenix” action climax disappointed test audiences last year, new scenes were written and filmed, though the prologue remained the same.

If there’s one superhero trope I can do without, it’s the fatal car accident in slow motion as a story-launcher. Two months ago we got one in “Shazam!” Now it’s “Dark Phoenix.”

Writer-director Simon Kinberg has used words like “traumatic” in interviews to describe his film’s tone and themes, and this latest in 19 years’ worth of occasionally good “X-Men” pictures.

Time to move on?

The new one says so long to certain major players, and Kinberg’s dialogue is heavy on reflective boilerplate such as Jennifer Lawrence (in her fourth assignment as Mystique) sighing to her fellow mutant, Beast (Nicholas Hoult): “Maybe it’s time for us to move on.” Actually, I think that lyric goes “Maybe it’s time to let the old ways die.”

Either way, “Dark Phoenix” wastes some excellent actors in a showcase for what might be called The Hands-y Acting Recital. The recital is required in digital effects-dependent extravaganzas such as this one, of course, but there are many scenes, for example, such as Michael Fassbender’s Magneto and the “Dark Phoenix” protagonist, Jean Grey, played by Sophie Turner of “Game of Thrones,” fighting over who’s going to telepathically and super-anti-heroically control the fate of a spinning helicopter.

In close-up, Turner does this “arrrggggghhh!” thing with her hands, indicating how hard it is to properly handle a compressed digital-effects energy ball or whatever. Cut to Fassbender, who does the same thing with his hands only further apart, as if to say: “Yeah? Well, my energy ball is THIS big!” while the helicopter goes whup-whup-whup and then there’s a brief reenactment of the last ‘copter out of Saigon in ‘75 (the “Dark Phoenix” prologue is set in the same year, though mostly it takes place in 1992), and composer Hans Zimmer’s music drones on and on and on and on. What if the music never ends?

On the run from her own scary powers of destruction, which she picks up early in “Dark Phoenix” after a space rescue mission places her perilously close to a solar flare, Ms. Grey discovers Magneto in a bucolic commune he manages for stray mutants out of favor. It looks so much like a paintball facility, you keep looking for the paint splotches.

Lip service

Director Kinberg, freely adapting “The Dark Phoenix Saga” by John Byrne, Chris Claremont and Dave Cockrum, pays lip service to Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) and his narcissistic ego. By messing with suddenly orphaned preteen Jean’s memories after the auto fatality prologue, he ends up making things worse.

It’s nice to hear Lawrence sling a zinger about the male-centric name of her own franchise. And when Jessica Chastain shows up as Vuk, interstellar alien working for the empire known as D’Bari (which boasts an Italian sandwich counter, I hear), the movie briefly stirs some anticipation of a smackdown slightly outside the usual order of business.

But what do we get? We get a film morose and dull, numbing in its body count and seriously galling in its emphasis on aliens getting shot up with heavy automatic gunfire at close range. They suffer not much, of course, but I can’t be the only one watching relentless scenes of intended slaughter in “Dark Phoenix” and thinking, well, I may be done rooting for the species with all the guns.

Lame do-over

The lesser “X-Men” movies, and there have been many, have a way of dragging their best players down to a lower level of skill. If you went into “Dark Phoenix” cold, without seeing any previous installments up through “X-Men: Apocalypse” (2016), you’d wonder if Jennifer Lawrence, Nicholas Hoult, Michael Fassbender or James McAvoy are any good, really.

As for Turner: She holds the screen, and manages various degrees and displays of pain and rage well enough. But coming out of “Dark Phoenix,” a lame do-over of the “Apocalypse” movie three years ago, you’re reminded that not all superhero franchises are created equal.

And once you’ve used “Apocalypse” as your movie’s subtitle, that’s it! That should be it. There should be nothing after an apocalypse, just as there should be nothing after an endgame.

Brent N. Clarke/Invision/AP
Jennifer Lawrence reprises her role as Mystique in the new “X-Men” movie, “Dark Phoenix.”
Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.