Review: ‘Charlie’s Angels’ is basic, globe-trotting nonsense |

Review: ‘Charlie’s Angels’ is basic, globe-trotting nonsense

ABC-TV wasn’t alone. But in the network’s flesh-peddling harem era of the 1970s, an adolescent boy could tune into “Charlie’s Angels” (or “Fantasy Island,” or “Battle of the Network Stars”) and begin developing some pretty dubious notions of female empowerment as it relates to straight male gratification.

Meaning, if the latter was covered, whatever with the former. And there it is: American show business in a nutshell.

On Broadway, for the better part of a century, the “glorification of the American girl” (per Florenz Ziegfeld and his Follies) meant packaging entertainment designed for the tired businessman and his wife, as they used to say.

So it was, too, on TV. And is, still, though things have broadened to include more and different ways to ogle, now with slightly less guilt and a more equitable and fluid range of sexual representation.

Amp up the camp

Released in 2000 and 2003, the “Charlie’s Angels” movies from the director insufferably known as McG proved that there was money to be made with the franchise, by amping the camp as well as the violence.

Now there’s a new “Charlie’s Angels” picture, this one from producer, writer, director and co-star Elizabeth Banks. It’s fairly entertaining globe-trotting nonsense for what it is, which isn’t much, but there you have it.

Kristen Stewart, in particular, makes a private party out of every scrap of comic relief she’s given, scoring with an impressive percentage of her muttered asides and drive-by zingers. She doesn’t hit any of her material for emphasis; rather, she gives some medium-grade retorts a winging-it air of spontaneity.

Her character, Sabina, is a Park Avenue rich kid who went rogue and became a superspy/private eye. The film’s central trio comprises Stewart, the British performer Naomi Scott (Jasmine in the recent live-action “Aladdin”) and, also British, Ella Balinska.

Forgettable plot

The plot, not easy to recall the next morning, concerns a corporate whistle-blower (Scott) whose sniveling boss (Nat Faxon) has overseen development of a super-powerful and mega-dangerous electrical source that can and damn well will be weaponized in the wrong hands.

The weaponization problem requires a solution, which means the Townsend Agency, which has become a global “Kingsman”-scale operation, must save the day, angel by angel. For the record, though, that won’t fly anymore: Ariana Grande, Miley Cyrus and Lana Del Rey sing the soundtrack’s lead single, titled “Don’t Call Me Angel.”

Is this a franchise divided against itself? Only if you’re hopelessly devoted to the way things used to be on ABC in the Farrah-haired days of yore.

Who cares if it doesn’t do PG-13-rated lap dances for the same tired businessmen the way the earliest iterations did? Banks certainly doesn’t. She’s trying to wake things up and snag the “Pitch Perfect 2” crowd (she directed that film, too), and their dates.

The film makes no bones about being a female-led, female-skewing audience picture.

Banks plays one of a million Bosleys overseeing a far-flung roster of “angels.” Other Bosleys are portrayed by Patrick Stewart and Djimon Hounsou.

OK action

The movie scoots from Rio to Hamburg to Berlin to Istanbul to London, always a few dozen extras shy of a plausible street scene.

The action’s OK; Banks and the movie fare best in smaller encounters (McG’s movies weren’t much good at anything, indoors or outdoors, except Cameron Diaz, dancing), such as a bookstore melee introducing the story’s tiresome deadly assassin (Jonathan Tucker).

I wish there were as many big payoffs and clever jokes as there are Bosleys in this movie. But Stewart and company have their fun, and we have a reasonable percentage of theirs.

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
From left: “Charlie’s Angels” director/writer/actress Elizabeth Banks and actresses Ella Balinska, Kristen Stewart and Naomi Scott arrive at the Los Angeles premiere of “Charlie’s Angels” at the Regency Theater Westwood on Nov. 11, 2019.
Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.