Review: Even two Will Smiths can’t save lifeless ‘Gemini Man’ | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Review: Even two Will Smiths can’t save lifeless ‘Gemini Man’

Will Smith is usually an asset for a movie. He’s the kind of true movie star whose charisma can elevate even the most mediocre material. You’d think then that it would be a good thing to have not just one, but two, Will Smiths in a movie if you can.

That was at least part of the idea behind “Gemini Man.” The action film from Ang Lee also uses state of the art de-aging technology to create a basically believable 20-something version of Smith and has billed itself as a “true event film” that “redefines action cinema.”

Those are some lofty claims, but unfortunately its biggest accomplishment seems to be in sapping all the charm out of Smith (twice!). For all the hype about the modern technology, the story is curiously stale and at times feels like a mashup of other, better movies.

It makes more sense when you learn that “Gemini Man” was written over 20 years ago and has gone through enough possible directors and stars to fill out a baseball team. Certainly it’s been updated since whatever version was making the rounds in 1997 — “Game of Thrones” showrunner David Benioff shares a story and screenplay credit with Darren Lemke and Billy Ray — but it still has a dated core, and not in a good, self-consciously retro way.

The last job

Smith, at his current age, plays Henry Brogan, a talented assassin employed by the U.S government who just wants to retire.

The film begins with his last job: He has to assassinate someone on a full speed bullet train while perched on a hill outside. Brogan is a one-in-a-million sniper, you see, and a bunch of other guys failed where he succeeded.

But of course, hanging up his hat afterward for a quiet life of fishing isn’t as simple as he hoped.

He soon finds out that he’s being monitored, and then hunted, by his former employers including a bureaucrat played by Linda Emond and a private contractor named Clay Varris (Clive Owen), who is one of the most one-dimensional “bad guys” we’ve had the privilege of spending time with in a while.

Henry has no choice but to go on the run, bringing the young agent who was assigned to surveil him, Danny (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), along because, well, there has to be a potential love interest in a movie like this, so why not?

This won’t come as a surprise to anyone who has seen any sort of “Gemini Man” marketing — although the movie seems to think it is a surprise — but they soon discover that the person Henry’s being hunted by is a much younger version of himself.

A lot of show

“Junior” (a de-aged Smith) is part of a shadowy program run by Varris called Gemini. The construct of “he knows every move I’m going to make” is an interesting one, but this film barely does anything with it. It’s too busy inexplicably continent-hopping and giving Winstead, Smith and Benedict Wong one-liners even they can’t sell.

Lee once again is using the high frame rate he deployed in “Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk” (which I liked more than most) but it’s even more distracting this time around. The hyper reality makes everything look somehow cheaper and less cinematic and it detracts from some of the genuinely well-choreographed action set pieces.

And while “Junior” does look pretty good for a computer-generated approximation of a 23-year-old Smith, it’s hard not to wish that all the time and money spent on this gimmick might have been put toward making sure the script and story were at least engaging and entertaining.

As it stands, “Gemini Man” is a lot of show, but there’s no life behind the eyes.


1788625_web1_1788625-cc4bc2cbcf094f9da6087caae640c8f2
Paramount Pictures/AP
This image released by Paramount Pictures shows Will Smith, portraying Junior, foreground, and Henry Brogan in the Ang Lee film “Gemini Man.” (Paramount Pictures via AP)
1788625_web1_1788625-5619a5398f62409b81ef7b99586e5d44
Paramount Pictures/AP
This image released by Paramount Pictures shows Clive Owen, left, and Will Smith, portraying Junior, in the Ang Lee film “Gemini Man.”
1788625_web1_1788625-97c0e88d6ad849579bf9434927fa0cbe
Ben Rothstein/Paramount Pictures/AP
This image released by Paramount Pictures shows, from left, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Will Smith and Benedict Wong in a scene from the Ang Lee film “Gemini Man.”
Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.