ShareThis Page
Review: If you’re not a superfan, ‘Hellboy’ is just hell, boy | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Review: If you’re not a superfan, ‘Hellboy’ is just hell, boy

1008524_web1_1008524-de7bdfecaa644144bf9f4633b923e505
Mark Rogers/Lionsgate/AP
This image released by Lionsgate shows David Harbour in a scene from “Hellboy.”
1008524_web1_1008524-c601dc1cef3d4bbea629cc4bf66b2ad8
Mark Rogers/Lionsgate/AP
This image released by Lionsgate shows Milla Jovovich (left) in a scene from “Hellboy.”
1008524_web1_1008524-d2ce5aa561d140aaaf39dceb8e24cb99
Mark Rogers/Lionsgate/AP
This image released by Lionsgate shows (from left) Daniel Dae Kim, David Harbour and Sasha Lane in a scene from “Hellboy.”

Hellboy is back and he’s got a dirty mouth and a man bun.

The third film in the comic adaptation franchise has a new director, a new writer and a new look — led by a swashbuckling hellion who uses expletives and wears one of the most ridiculed hair styles in decades.

“Hellboy ” is a reboot of artist and writer Mike Mignola’s fantasy world that rather rudely brushes aside the first two films as if they never existed. It’s like your new girlfriend blithely tossing out all the accumulated stuff in your medicine cabinet.

It even ignores in its title that we’ve already had a “Hellboy.”

Out is director Guillermo del Toro, a monster maker of epic proportions. Out is the original Hellboy, Ron Perlman. Out is the PG-13 rating.

Series of violent vignettes

Now we’ve got an edgier, R-rated brightly red hero in a film that can best be described as tedious. This “Hellboy” stars the always-likeable David Harbour of “Stranger Things” in a film even his charm can’t save.

It’s really a series of violent vignettes strung together, getting more and more outlandish and introducing characters at such a blistering pace that you just want it to stop already.

Casual fans or the uninitiated are in trouble right from the beginning.

Andrew Cosby’s screenplay doesn’t unspool a coherent story so much as violently shoehorn in diverse elements from the comics, over-stuffing every scene and only then trying to explain why it’s been included.

Director Neil Marshall leaves anyone not familiar with this world grasping and gasping. Scenes seem to just end abruptly, as if Marshall was the one trapped in story panels.

A fight sequence with three giants is really the only astonishingly realized bit in the whole film. (It looks like a different set of filmmakers made it).

Chaos on the streets

What you need to know is that Hellboy is a devil who ends up working for the good guys, the Bureau for Paranormal Research and Defense. (These civil servants aren’t too good at their job, by the way: They find out that one of their enemies is causing chaos on the streets outside — from watching Sky News.)

Hellboy is basically a monster who hunts monsters, rejecting his DNA by cutting off his horns and stalking around in a ratty raincoat with no shirt. He deals with sorcery and ancient curses, utters strip club jokes, hears standard comic book lines — “Revenge is the only sustenance I require” — and has a hand in gore, beheadings, eyes gouged out and deep ugliness.

The movie starts in 517 AD, then goes to modern-day Mexico, Colorado, London, the English countryside and Siberia.

The soundtrack is a bro-fest that includes entries by Mötley Crüe and Alice Cooper, and the songs seem like they were chosen by junior high kids being a little too on-the-nose — like “The Devil You Know” by X Ambassadors and “Beat the Devil’s Tattoo” by Black Rebel Motorcycle Club.

We meet the ancient Russian witch Baba Yaga; the evil, Liverpool-accented porcine monster Gruagach (Stephen Graham); Hellboy’s adoptive father (Ian McShane); the Queen of Blood (Milla Jovovich); the wizard Merlin and King Arthur (no, seriously); a cool young woman with powers, named Alice (Sasha Lane); a cool older sorceress (Sophie Okonedo), and a fellow agent-monster played by Daniel Dae Kim with a pretty terrible British accent.

Seriously underwhelming

So underwhelming was this film that a recent screening in New York only sparked polite applause after it was finally over. And that was the red carpet premiere with all the cast in attendance.

So even having Hellboy in the audience couldn’t whip up much enthusiasm for “Hellboy.”

Harbour himself is fine, channeling the blue-collar, resigned here-we-go-again ethos of Hellboy. But his lines seem to fall flat.

“Let’s eat some barbecue!” he declares as he attacks the pig monster

It’s sort of funny but somehow in this muddle of a film, it doesn’t land. It’s a pity because underneath all the silliness, there’s a rich vein the film seems to try to mine — whether what you are born determines who you become.

“There has to be a world where monsters don’t have to hide in the shadows,” the Queen of Blood says to Hellboy, tempting him to join her side. This makes Hellboy pause, since he’s basically slaughtering his brothers and sisters.

“You made me a goddamn weapon,” he screams at dad.

That discussion raises a question about the film itself: Maybe the reason it staggers so poorly is because its DNA is all wrong. If the first two films lacked a certain verve and the third is a violent muddle, maybe making “Hellboy” movies is as cursed as its hero.

Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.