Review: ‘It Chapter Two’ a satisfying, if overstuffed, sequel |

Review: ‘It Chapter Two’ a satisfying, if overstuffed, sequel

Brooke Palmer/Warner Bros.
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows (from left) Bill Hader, Jessica Chastain, James McAvoy, James Ransone, Isaiah Mustafa and Jay Ryan in New Line Cinema’s horror thriller “It: Chapter 2,” in theaters on Sept. 6.
Warner Bros.
This image released by Warner Bros. Pictures shows Bill Skarsgard as Pennywise in New Line Cinema’s horror thriller “It: Chapter 2,” in theaters on Sept. 6.

It can be a cheesy thing when a novel is split up and spread out over a handful of films, but Stephen King’s “It” is not one of those books.

Andy Muschietti’s first crack at King’s 1,100-page doorstop, 2017’s “It,” dealt with the first half: the Losers Club, a band of “Stranger Things”-like adolescent outcasts, battling the shape-shifting demon clown Pennywise (a wonderfully gangly Bill Skarsgard) in the Maine town of Derry.

“It Chapter Two” takes up the book’s second half when those kids, now grown, are called back 27 years later to Derry after Pennywise returns.

That time span gives Muscietti’s “Chapter Two” some deeper meanings to play with: how many of our darkest fears don’t change so much from childhood, how the brutalities of life bring new horrors, how fun it is to imagine Finn Wolfhard growing up to be Bill Hader.

Made with the same visual flair as the first movie by Muschietti, “It Chapter Two” is likewise a big-screen funhouse full of vivid set-piece thrills animated by each character’s fears. Some are better than others, but they are consistently imaginative. In one, a giant Paul Bunyan statue turns menacing and careens through the town square.

It’s stuff like this that made “It” such a sensation and “Chapter Two” such a satisfying, if overstuffed, sequel. It has less to do with the scary clown and more to do with its maximalist nightmares.

Hallucinatory but familiar visions come alive. One ill-advised peek into Pennywise’s sewer, in a scene worthy of Dali, culminates in a swarming hive of hands clawing at the interloper.

Time has done some funny things to the Losers Club.

Richie Tozier (Hader) is now a stand-up comic. Bill Denbrough (James McAvoy; Jaeden Martell as a boy) is novelist whose book is being adapted into a movie. Beverly Harsh (Jessica Chastain; Sophia Lillis as a girl), having been abused as a child by her father, has fallen into an abusive marriage.

Eddie Kaspbrak (James Ramone; Jack Dylan Grazer as a kid) is a successful New York businessman. Ben Hanscom (Jay Ryan; Jeremy Ray Taylor as a boy), overweight as a youngster, has somehow hit the jackpot. He’s thin, handsome and an architect.

Once Pennywise is again on the loose and red balloons start ominously floating through Derry, each receives a phone call from Mike Hanlon (Isaiah Mustafa; Chosen Jacobs as a kid), the lone Losers Club member to remain in their Maine hometown.

They return to fulfill a blood oath sworn as kids to come back to defeat Pennywise again, if he ever reappears. But traveling away from Derry has somehow made their memories foggy, and they come back with only a faint idea of why they’re back.

Just as the first “It” was a coming-of-age tale, “Chapter Two” is a homecoming. It’s a reunion movie, just with some dead kids here and there.

Part of the appeal of both films is in how they balance dark and light. “Chapter Two,” especially, is funny — thanks in large part to Hader (who slides in a Jabba the Hutt impression) and Ramone, the likeably frenetic actor who played Iggy in the second season of “The Wire.”

“It” also tips the other way, and as clever as some of the movie’s nightmare scenarios are, a handful derive cheap scares out of terrible fates befalling children in scenes drawn out for suspense. It’s an easy route to getting an audience’s adrenaline up, and a dubious method of movie-making.

Hitchcock did it once and later called it “a grave error.” There is less evidence of contemplation behind the violence in Muscietti’s film.

But the “It” movies— a kind of pop-horror with ghastly scenes you can eat popcorn to — have a way of dealing both seriously and blithely with such terrors. Our fears are both terrifying and ridiculous in “It.” They’re rendered impotent only by our own insistence of their powerlessness.

The group dynamics of the (very good) cast propel the film as each Losers Club member faces down his or her personal demons. (Chastain especially gives the material a lift.)

Taking each storyline at a time, all accompanied by flashbacks, gives each character some depth, even as the crowded film — at nearly three-hours long — verges on turning into a clown car.

That sheer much-ness is in the spirit of King’s massive book. “Chapter Two,” for better or worse, is a horror carnival.

Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.