ShareThis Page
Review: ‘Nancy Drew’ gets bolt of energy from spunky new heroine | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Review: ‘Nancy Drew’ gets bolt of energy from spunky new heroine

Rick Bentley
| Thursday, March 14, 2019 10:29 a.m.

Various television and film adaptations of the tales of sleuth Nancy Drew — a character introduced in 1930 to young readers as a counterpart to the Hardy Boys — have been produced since 1938.

Recent offerings have featured Pamela Sue Martin, Emma Roberts, Tracy Ryan and Maggie Lawson in the title role. Each of those performers brought their own vision of the crime-solving teen.

Now, it’s Sophia Lillis who has stepped into the gumshoe’s shoes. Best known for her work in “It,” she stars in “Nancy Drew and the Hidden Staircase,” based on the second book in the mystery series.

Following the death of his wife, Carson Drew (Sam Trammell) moves with his daughter (Lillis) from the excitement of Chicago to a peaceful existence in the small city of River Heights.

With Nancy, excitement can be found anywhere.

Latest incarnation

When she learns that a local woman (Linda Lavin) is dealing with ghosts in her house, Nancy must find the logical reason behind floating lights, mysterious creatures and a house that comes to life to save the day. Help comes from her two new friends (Mackenzie Graham, Zoe Renee) and her new frenemy, Helen (Laura Slade Wiggins).

It’s time to look at the clues and decide if this latest incarnation of Nancy Drew is a worthy addition to the character’s long screen legacy.

Let’s start with Nancy Drew herself. In all the other incarnations, Drew has been played with a massive curiosity spurred on by her spunky nature. Her age has wavered over the years, but in this case Nancy is 16.

Lillis brings the same level of curiosity, and she’s definitely not short of spunk. What makes this Nancy a little different is there seems to be a little more of a tomboy element.

Nancy is 16 but doesn’t have her driver’s license, and her chief method of travel is a skateboard. She doesn’t mind bending the law if it helps her quest for the truth.

Easy to like

All this is presented by Lillis with an unbridled energy that makes the character easy to like. She finds just the right amount of rebel to make Nancy tough and strong, but never to the point where she comes across as being disrespectful.

Director Katt Shea (“The Rage: Carrie 2”) pushes Lillis to play the role with almost a mischievous quality that works well.

Nancy’s not perfect and spends a lot of time dealing with local law, but the antihero approach ends up making her a strong role model, as she is brave, smart and funny even in the face of serious danger.

Where “Nancy Drew and the Hidden Staircase” has its problems is with the writing. The script by Nina Fiore (“The Handmaid’s Tale”) and John Herrera (“Alphas”) incorporates many of the elements from the original book, including a key plot point built around a railroad.

Massive plot hole

The problems pop up with shortcuts taken or plot points written around that make no sense.

The massive hole in the writing can’t be discussed without giving away too much. It is a life-or-death moment where no scenario works if logical thinking is followed. It takes a fun mystery and turns it into a writing blunder not worthy of association with the series.

Even with that major miscue, “Nancy Drew and the Hidden Staircase” works well for its target audience. It shows that anyone can stand up to peer pressure, bullying or even a ghost if they are smart and strong enough.

As for the mystery of how good the movie is, the case is closed on a positive note.


880654_web1_gtr-mov-nancydrew-031419
Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP
From left: Laura Wiggins, Sophia Lillis, Katt Shea, Mackenzie Graham and Zoe Renee at the world premiere of “Nancy Drew and the Hidden Staircase,” on March 10, 2019, in Los Angeles.
Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.