Which horror villain tops Pennsylvania searches? | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Which horror villain tops Pennsylvania searches?

Chris Pastrick
1840141_web1_web-scream

Now is the time of the Freddy Kruegers, the Pennywises, the Jason Voorhees … er, eeses.

There are so many horror villains to pick from. Which are our favorites? How would we ever determine it? Oh, the horror!

Frontier Communications has a solution. The telecommunications company boiled down the lineup of scary movie antiheroes and then used Google Trends to check the search volume for the past 12 months.

The result is a list of which villain is the most-searched in each state.

Fav-Horror-Villan-MAP-ONLY-FINAL-JPG
Frontier Communications

Pennsylvanians seem to dig Jack Torrence from the horror classic “The Shining.” Of course, Torrence was also the top choice in the most number of states. In addition to Pa., his toll included Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Oregon, Tennessee and Wisconsin.

For those in neighboring Ohio, Leatherface was the pick, along with Arizona, Kentucky and Texas. Those in West Virginia picked Freddy Krueger — the only state to pick the sweater-clad, steel-fingered dude.

The second most popular horror villain was Pennywise, who topped searches in Alabama, Iowa, Idaho, Indiana, Maine, North Dakota, Utah and Virginia.

Other icons to make the list: Chucky (tops in six states), Frankenstein’s Monster (six), Hannibal Lecter (five), Alien (three), Carrie (two), Ghostface (two), Norman Bates (two) and Count Dracula (one).

Fav-Horror-Villan-Map-LEGEND-FINAL-JPG
Frontier Communications

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Movies TV | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.