ShareThis Page
Movies/TV

Review: Clint Eastwood's '15:17 to Paris' suffers from limited focus

| Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, 10:51 a.m.

In his latest film, “The 15:17 to Paris,” Clint Eastwood has taken his famously no-frills filmmaking further than ever before. Having already dispensed with many of the typical accoutrements of Hollywood filmmaking — lengthy development, a battery of takes, any hand-wringing at all — he has, with characteristically little anguish, jettisoned actors from the picture, too. Who needs ‘em, anyway?

Truth be told, there are numerous professional actors in “The 15:17 to Paris,” about the foiled terrorist attack on a 2015 Paris-bound train. But the central characters, and even many of the extras, are played by themselves. The movie, simple and straightforward, derives most of its appeal from its verisimilitude — from its distinctly un-Hollywood-ness.

That's enough to make “The 15:17 to Paris” a refreshingly humble artifact in the often bombastic genre of terrorism thrillers. But it's not the quality of the acting that limits Eastwood's film. It's a threadbare script that fails to find much of a story to tell behind the headlines about how Oregon National Guardsman Alek Skarlatos, U.S. Air Force Airman First Class Spencer Stone and their friend Anthony Sadler, a college student, tackled and subdued an assailant armed with an AK-47 and nearly 300 rounds of ammunition.

An everyman story

“The 15:17 to Paris” follows Eastwood's “Sully,” which also told a story of a regular man turned international hero. In the overly morose tale of Capt. Chesley Sullenberger's 2009 Hudson River landing, Eastwood focused on the strain of an unwanted spotlight. Here, he gladly shines it on Skarlatos, Stone and Sadler, all of whom look understandably thrilled to be in a Clint Eastwood movie.

It's far from without precedent to cast real people, particularly ones with military experience. Maybe the movie business senses soldiers have something that can't be faked. There was Harold Russell's Oscar-winning World War II veteran in William Wyler's “The Best Years of Our Lives” (1946), the decorated Audie Murphy in 1955's “To Hell and Back” and, more recently, 2012's “Act of Valor,” with active duty Navy SEALS.

Skarlatos and Stone are far from elite forces, though. Much of “The 15:17 to Paris” recounts their childhood together (the three became friends in middle school), their earlier aspirations of joining the military, and their disappointment at not quickly finding distinction in the ranks. Skarlatos fails to qualify for the Air Force Pararescue. Stone finds himself providing security — “basically a mall cop,” he sighs — in Afghanistan.

Dorothy Blyskal's script, based on the book the trio wrote with Jeffery E. Stern, flashes through key points in their lives, focusing mainly on Skarlatos. Judy Greer and Jenna Fischer drop in as single moms. There is Thomas Lennon as a school principal and Tony Hale as a gym teacher — a set-up worthy of a promising network sitcom, but their moments here are brief.

Really, what any of them are doing in the film is a little uncertain. “The 15:17 to Paris” is even more out of balance once it gets to the guys backpacking through Europe ahead of the attack. As they philosophize while taking selfies and plot their next party, a Richard Linklater film is almost at risk of breaking out.

A meandering ride

“The 15:17 to Paris” is a brief ride at 94 minutes but it's a meandering one littered with gaps in the narrative and a missing sense of purpose. Eastwood feels less engaged with the material, content to settle for merely recreating a patriotic outliner in an otherwise tragic recent history of terrorism.

Maybe the story is better suited to someone like the docudrama expert Paul Greengrass (“United 93,” “Captain Phillips”). When the big moment comes, it's well staged and presented without thundering music: a restrained climax for a sluggish movie.

But by focusing solely on the three pals, Eastwood has slighted the story of Mark Moogalian, a 51-year-old American-born Frenchman and professor at the Sorbonne who was one of the first to battle the gunman. Moogalian, who appears in the film as himself, was shot in his neck. We get the Legion of Honor ceremony for the three Americans, but neither the backstory nor even a final word on Moogalian's fate.

Context is not one of the attributes of “15:17.” It's too contented with the heroism of a few Americans to take any notice of anything else. The thwarted attack came amid a rash of terror across France. Three months later, 130 would die in coordinated suicide bombings in Paris. Eleven months later, 84 would die in Nice when a truck drove through crowds celebrating Bastille Day.

The heroes of the train attack deserve all the praise. But zoom out a little and it's hard not to see Eastwood's America-centric focus in “The 15:17 to Paris” as self-serving.

Jake Coyle is an Associated Press film writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me