ShareThis Page
Movies/TV

Is 'Die Hard' a Christmas movie? You decide

| Thursday, Dec. 6, 2018, 10:09 a.m.
Bruce Willis as police officer John McClane in “Die Hard” (1988).
Twentieth Century Fox
Bruce Willis as police officer John McClane in “Die Hard” (1988).
Alan Rickman and Bonnie Bedelia in “Die Hard” (1988).
Twentieth Century Fox
Alan Rickman and Bonnie Bedelia in “Die Hard” (1988).
Bruce Willis, Bonnie Bedelia, and Reginald VelJohnson in “Die Hard” (1988).
Twentieth Century Fox
Bruce Willis, Bonnie Bedelia, and Reginald VelJohnson in “Die Hard” (1988).
Alan Rickman as villain Hans Gruber in “Die Hard” (1988).
Twentieth Century Fox
Alan Rickman as villain Hans Gruber in “Die Hard” (1988).
Alan Rickman in 'Die Hard'
flickr.com
Alan Rickman in 'Die Hard'
'Die Hard' poster
IMDb
'Die Hard' poster

It's December, which explains the humorous if not annoying debate over whether "Die Hard" is a Christmas movie.

Why is this a thing?

It's too bad everyone can't just enjoy the movie for what it is: arguably one of the best action films of all time. With one of the best villains of all time.

According to a poll conducted by Morning Consult and the Hollywood Reporter, most people don't believe "Die Hard" is a Christmas movie.

In fact, only 1 in 4 adults said they think it fits the bill.

The largest demographic of adults who believe it is a Christmas movie is the 30- to 44-year-old group (37 percent for, 51 percent against).

While set in Los Angeles on Christmas eve, the movie was actually released in U.S. theaters in July 1988 .

It does, however, feature Run DMC's "Christmas in Hollis."

You decide.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me