ShareThis Page
Movies/TV

Did Grover from 'Sesame Street' just say the f-word?

Patrick Varine
| Saturday, Dec. 29, 2018, 8:09 a.m.

Is that dress black and blue or white and gold? Did you hear that voice say "Laurel" or "Yanni"?

And now: did Grover just say the "f-word"?

The short answer is no, he didn't. But in the seven-second "Sesame Street" clip above that has gone viral in the past day, you can sure convince yourself he does.

In talking with fellow muppet Rosita, Grover exclaims "Move the camera, yes! That sounds like an excellent idea!" But with the suggestion in your mind, it's not difficult to hear the second sentence as something very different, that definitely does not belong on a children's TV show.

In explaining the Laurel-versus-Yanny debate to NBC News, a Dolby Laboratories scientist said we each have individual factors affecting our perception of sound, including our age, the gender of the speaker, whether we hear higher or lower frequencies better, and even the device we use to listen to a particular sound.

"We each have a different cookie cutter in how our brain is interpreting this information, which influence how we hear things differently than another person," said Poppy Crum, chief scientist at Dolby Laboratories.

Take a listen for yourself.

Here's a few of the best Twitter reactions to the video:

It's dividing families!

Here's a strange argument… he's earned the right to cuss?

And of course, wishful thinking…

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me