2019 is 100% the year of Lizzo | TribLIVE.com
Music

2019 is 100% the year of Lizzo

1726871_web1_gtr-liv-lizzo01-092719
Brent N. Clarke/Invision/AP
Singer/songwriter Lizzo performs on stage at The Anthem Sept. 25 in Washington.

Lizzo is having a year that has moved so readily from peak to peak that sometimes it feels scripted. She appears destined to win a bunch of artist-of-the-year accolades in a few months, a case of a talented if highly unconventional innovator arriving on a bigger stage at just the right time.

Her emergence intersects with countless history-rattling moments and movements: body-positive activist, feminist, LGBTQ advocate, self-empowerment crusader, #BlackLivesMatter. She delivers robust songs in a voice that veers from rapid-firing rapping to multi-octave singing, occasionally punctuated by classically trained flute riffs and solos (a decade in school marching bands will do that for you). She roars with a fury that’s surely righteous, but salted with humor, a sense of mischief both self-deprecating and wickedly sarcastic. She’s the antithesis of the manufactured pop icon, but rather a self-realized outsider. Lizzo is the misfit who learned not just to accept her quirks and so-called “imperfections” but to celebrate them and in doing so, improbably widened her appeal.

Musical beginnings

Lizzo started rapping while growing up in Houston (later moving to Minneapolis), but her vision couldn’t be confined to hip-hop. She not only studied and played flute, but jumped into a number of bands playing everything from electro to R&B. She appeared destined to a career in underground music, a gifted, multi-faceted artist who didn’t fit the mold of a conventional pop star.

But her rule-breaking style and brand of “no-genre hip-hop” brought her opening slots on tours by admirers such as Sleater-Kinney and Haim, and collaborations with the RuPaul and late, great Prince. After a series of indie releases, she signed a major-label deal with Atlantic and earlier this year released her highest profile album yet, “Cuz I Love You.”

It amplified Lizzo’s strengths at the expense of some of her more nuanced musical attributes, but the songs were constructed to burst through the pop-music clutter and succeeded. For many, this was an introduction to a singer who, at 31, was a decade older than many of the newcomers on the charts. Lizzo vanquished them all with roof-raising anthems such as the album’s title track and the blues-drenched “Jerome.”

The subsequent tour skipped across New Orleans bounce, reggae, funk, blues, house and gospel while the singer-rapper shook and shimmied across the stage with four dancers.

Lizzo’s music connected with a range of listeners by defying barriers of genre, gender and generation. Last week, video surfaced of Congresswomen Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley busting a few dance moves and singing along with Lizzo’s self-empowerment anthem “Truth Hurts” at an event at Culture House, a nonprofit venue in Washington, D.C.

The NSFW “Truth Hurts,” along with “Good as Hell,” also figured prominently in her exuberant recent performance with her dancers, the Big Grrrls, at the MTV Music Video Awards. It rivaled any on the show in recent years. Above all, it screamed freedom — freedom from expectations, from stereotyping, from limitations, from the culture of “no.”

“Every woman on that stage had a story of either why they shouldn’t have been on that stage or why they didn’t believe they deserved to be on that stage, including myself,” Lizzo said in an Instagram post after the show. “‘Imposter syndrome’ is a privilege to the most marginalized group in America. Not only were we taught to believe we didn’t belong in the spotlight, but when we finally get to a place (of) self-worth the world tries to knock us down. Not this time. The world smiled with us. The world sang us. The world saw our beauty last night. The world saw black women feeling Good As Hell and cheered us on.”

Categories: AandE | Music
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.