ShareThis Page
Music

Julius Eastman's music gains new life at Carnegie Museum

| Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 9:00 p.m.
Musician Jace Clayton also performs under the name DJ /rupture
Rocio Rodriguez Salceda
Musician Jace Clayton also performs under the name DJ /rupture

Few people remember the groundbreaking, thoroughly original music of Julius Eastman.

That could change soon, thanks to Jace Clayton — best known as the pioneering electronic musician DJ/rupture. Clayton will perform Eastman's music live March 14 at the Carnegie Museum of Art in Oakland.

Eastman was a mercurial minimalist composer and pianist, and defiant outsider to the world of contemporary classical music. As a gay African American working in the late '70s and '80s, fitting in easily probably wasn't an option.

But Eastman was a provocateur by nature. Giving his pieces titles like 1980's “Gay Guerilla,” which appropriates pieces of Martin Luther's hymn “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,” probably didn't make his work easier to accept.

He died at age 49, having spent his last few months homeless.

When Clayton discovered Eastman's music about four years ago, he was shocked.

“I was blown away. Long 25-minute epic pieces for piano. It's minimalism, but they're very muscular at points, gentle and delicate at others,” Clayton says. “These overwhelming pieces — it's almost as if there are worlds within them.

“He was ... part of the scene in all kinds of contemporary music — classical minimalist composers, but also in the disco world with Arthur Russell and others. This was very serious and underappreciated.”

At the time he was introduced to Eastman, Clayton says he was interested in doing something with pianos. This led to “The Julius Eastman Memory Depot,” an album interpreting and paying tribute to Eastman.

His concert at the Warhol will use custom-designed software to “process” the piano playing of David Friend and Emily Manzo, with vocals from Arooj Aftab.

“It's two pianists, playing Eastman's scores,” Clayton says. “On top of that, I am taking a microphone from each piano, and pulling (the music) into my laptop. I'm improvising, doing different kinds of effects, real-time sampling and processing, getting real-time piano and transforming it.”

Clayton's DJ/rupture persona is pretty far removed from any sort of classical music, juxtaposing hip-hop music, Jamaican dance hall, South American cumbia, Berber tribal music and other left-field sources into challenging extended mixes. However, he's confident that fans of unusual electronic music will come along for the ride, even into modern classical compositions.

Eastman may just be another case of an artist ahead of his time. But institutional racism, homophobia and a penchant for self-sabotage also affected the sparse, incomplete legacy he left.

“He knew what he was doing,” Clayton says. “He wants to be seen in this (classical music) world, but doesn't want to accept it as it is.”

Clayton also will perform one of his own compositions, “Callback from the American Society of Eastman Supporters” — which imagines a future where Eastman impersonators are as commonplace as Elvis impersonators.

“The conceit is that I'm being interviewed for the job as a Julius Eastman impersonator. It has radio-type sound effects, and a whole story to it.

“There's a small group of people who are like ‘This is a legacy that you shouldn't mess with,” Clayton says. “It's mixing very serious, intense music, with elements of playfulness, surprise and unscriptedness. Which is in Eastman's spirit.”

Michael Machosky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at mmachosky@tribweb.com or 412-320-7901.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me