Billboard pulls Lil Nas X’s viral ‘Old Town Road’ from the country chart, igniting a controversy |

Billboard pulls Lil Nas X’s viral ‘Old Town Road’ from the country chart, igniting a controversy

The Washington Post
Columbia Records
Rapper Lil Nas X’s song, “Old Town Road,” has become a viral sensation.

The definition of “real” country music often sparks fierce debate. This week, it also ignited a controversy.

It all started in December when 19-year-old Atlanta rapper Lil Nas X released “Old Town Road,” which his producer described as “country trap” and his label called a “country-inspired rap track.” Incorporating banjo, hip-hop and sampling Nine Inch Nails’s “34 Ghosts IV,” it arrived with a music video featuring cowboys amid the Wild West.

The song blew up on YouTube and SoundCloud and fueled a popular meme on the app TikTok; by late February, it was No. 1 on Spotify’s Viral 50 playlist. It soon topped the iTunes country chart. The success sparked a bidding war among record labels, and Lil Nas X landed a deal with Sony Music’s Columbia Records. In mid-March, “Old Town Road” went mainstream as it broke into the all-genre Billboard Hot 100 at No. 83. The song also debuted at No. 19 on the Billboard Hot Country Songs chart, which measures streaming, sales and radio play.

That’s when the controversy began.

Earlier this week, Rolling Stone published a feature about how “Old Town Road” became a viral hit, reporting that Billboard had “quietly removed” the song from the Hot Country chart and “informed Lil Nas X’s label, Columbia Records, that his inclusion on the ranking was a mistake.” Billboard told Rolling Stone, “While ‘Old Town Road’ incorporates references to country and cowboy imagery, it does not embrace enough elements of today’s country music to chart in its current version.”

The song is currently at No. 12 on the Hot Rap chart.

The story swiftly made the rounds in music outlets. Lil Nas X, whose label did not return The Washington Post’s request for comment, Instagrammed Pitchfork’s article with a sad face emoji and wrote “extremely disappointed.”

He tweeted: “just because old town road has funny lines doesn’t mean it’s parody. it has a theme. anybody with ears can tell i put some kind of effort into that song.”

This isn’t the first time there has been dispute over country classification. In 2016, Texas band Green River Ordinance did not seem thrilled when Billboard labeled them as “rock and folk,” taking away their chance for high placement on the country album chart.

But “Old Town Road” was primed to blow up on social media, as it touched on several polarizing topics: the decades-long debate of what defines country music; the idea that many of country’s recent biggest hits involve elements of rap and hip-hop, from Jason Aldean’s “Dirt Road Anthem” to Sam Hunt’s “Break Up in a Small Town”; and the fact that country music is an overwhelmingly white genre, in which a black artist was only recently able to launch his career with a No. 1 hit.

Rapper Ski Mask the Slump God tweeted a Twitter Moment roundup of the issue and wrote, “Wow, Discrimination At It’s Finest”; Lil Nas X quoted the tweet and added, “bro thank u for being one of the only artists to speak on this publicly.”

Billboard said that dropping the song from the country chart “had absolutely nothing to do with the race of the artist.” Lil Nas X’s manager Danny Kang agreed, telling Rolling Stone “That’s a hip-hop song” and explaining that the rapper strategically listed the track on SoundCloud and iTunes as country to gain more traction. (“Old Town Road” no longer appears on the iTunes country chart.)

A Billboard spokeswoman declined to make staffers available for an interview, but released an extended statement to The Washington Post Thursday night:

“When categorizing genres for chart inclusion, Billboard examines several factors, including a song or album’s musical composition (with acknowledgment that sounds within genres consistently evolve; an artist’s recording history and track record within a particular genre; similarity to current charting titles in that genre; which radio formats and streaming platforms are showing notable support; and how a title is being marketed.

“In the case of ‘Old Town Road’ by Lil Nas X, it prematurely charted on Hot Country Songs because its rights holders had tagged it as country, but it hadn’t yet been thoroughly vetted for the standard criteria noted above. The song’s removal was primarily based on the track’s overall lack of country music instrumentation, and subsequently, in the tracking week ending March 24, it received 63 plays (translating to 286,000 audience impressions) on radio stations reporting to Billboard’s Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop airplay chart and zero on stations reporting to the Country Airplay survey, according to Nielsen Music.

“The song is also classified as various forms of rap, but not country, on Spotify; was not released by a country-focused record label; and its producer, YoungKio, told Billboard, ‘This beat is a trap beat with a rock-type sample. That’s how I see it. It’s not a country beat.’

“Decisions to remove a title are never made lightly or without thought given to all affected parties. The removal of a title from any of our genre charts is not a common occurrence, but has happened in the past under similar circumstances in which a charted title was deemed not an ideal fit after additional analysis. At the same time, such decisions are not final and remain subject to further review as the market evolves.”

While many on social media debated the issue, it also turned into a larger conversation about how artists of color are treated by the music industry, including in the pop and rock genres. Others brought up the fact that, again, lots of country hits don’t sound like “traditional” country anymore, so why should this song be treated differently?

Categories: AandE | Music
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.