Clarion Quartet explores music suppressed by the Nazis |

Clarion Quartet explores music suppressed by the Nazis

Mark Kanny
Todd Rosenberg Photography
The Clarion Quartet — Jennifer Orchard, violin; Marta Krechkovsky, violin; Tatjana Mead Chamis, viola; and Bronwyn Banerdt, cello.

The Clarion Quartet is a group with a mission and performs at the highest level, but gives few performances because its members have another job — members of the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra. Two upcoming concerts are therefore special events.

The musicians formed the quartet to play a single concert exploring music suppressed by the Nazis. They were so inspired by the quality of what they discovered they decided to continue performing together to give this repertoire the exposure it deserves alongside already established repertoire.

Both upcoming concerts will feature music by Mieczyslaw Weinberg, a Polish Jewish musician who lost most of his family in the Holocaust. Weinberg escaped to Russia where he became a close friend and colleague of Dmitri Shostakovich.

The first of the Clarion Quartet concert will present Felix Mendelssohn’s String Quintet No. 2, with guest violist David Harding, and Weinberg’s Piano Quintet with pianist Dimitri Papadimitriou as part of the Chamber Music Series at Carnegie Mellon.

The concert starts at 7:30 p.m. April 29 in Kresge Theatre, College of Fine Arts, CMU. Admission is free. Call 412-268-2383 to reserve a ticket.

The second Clarion concert will be part of the Music at Rodef Shalom concert series. The program is Ludwig van Beethoven’s Quartet No. 16, Shostakovich’s Quartet No. 7 and Weinberg’s Quartet No. 2.

This concert starts at 8 p.m. at Rodef Shalom Congregation on the edge of Pittsburgh’s Oakland and Shadyside neighborhoods. Admission is free. No reservation required.

Details: 412-621-6566.

Mark Kanny is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

Categories: AandE | Music
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.