French conductor Emmanuel Krivine makes PSO debut |

French conductor Emmanuel Krivine makes PSO debut

Mark Kanny
Julien Beckerb
Conductor Emmanuel Krivine

Generalizations and stereotypes often fall apart with just a little scratching of the surface. You might think a French pianist’s favorite music would be French, or at least for piano, but Robert Casadesus most loved German composer Ludwig van Beethoven’s late string quartets.

The Pittsburgh Symphony is anticipating the debut of a prominent French conductor, Emmanuel Krivine, not that he’ll conduct any French music at the concerts. His parents were Polish and Russian. An outstanding violinist, who won top honors at the Paris Conservatory, he was turned on to what has become his profession by experiencing Austrian Karl Bohm conducting Anton Bruckner’s Symphony No. 7.

Krivine will conduct the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra April 5-7 at Pittsburgh’s Heinz Hall. The program is Franz Joseph Haydn’s Variations on a Theme by Haydn, Boris Blacher’s Orchestra Variations on a Theme of Niccolo Paganini and Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 5.

A conductor known for his stylish, imaginative and committed performances, Krivine is music director of the Orchestre National de France and principal guest conductor of the Scottish Chamber Orchestra.

Krivine will begin with Brahms’ Haydn Variations, which the orchestra has not performed for more than a decade. The music was written in 1873 after a scholar showed Brahms the manuscripts of some pieces for wind ensemble he thought were composed by Haydn. The St. Anthony Chorale caught Brahms’ attention, probably in part because the tune is a five-measure phrase, rather than the usual four.

The wide emotional range and depth of the eight variations and magnificent final section propelled Brahms’ international renown.

The concert will continue with a contrasting set of variations by another German composer. Blacher wrote his Paganini Variations in 1947, which remains his best-known work to this day. It was last performed by the symphony in 1988 under Lorin Maazel at Heinz Hall and on tour.

Blacher’s Variations are based on the theme of Paganini’s Caprice No. 24 for solo violin, which is itself a theme and four variations. The simple tune is so well-suited for variations that many composers have used it. The most famous is Sergei Rachmaninoff’s Rhapsody for piano and orchestra, which the symphony performed earlier this season. Other notable variations on this tune were composed by Brahms and several 20 th century composers including Witold Lutoslawski.

Blacher’s variations begin with a solo violin playing the tune the way Paganini wrote it, followed by the full orchestra taking off into a world of brilliant invention. Blacher’s 16 short variations are a showpiece for virtuoso orchestra.

Krivine’s debut will conclude with Tchaikovsky’s Fifth Symphony, as much a Fate symphony as Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5. Tchaikovsky’s Fate theme is heard right at the start of the first movement’s slow introduction and throughout the piece. The second movement is about love, which the composer revealed in word notes in his sketches, followed by a gorgeous waltz. The finale builds to a triumphant climax, capped by a variation of the Fate motif leading the exultation.

Mark Kanny is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

Categories: AandE | Music
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.