Westmoreland Symphony opens 51st season with ‘Russian Masters’ | TribLIVE.com

Westmoreland Symphony opens 51st season with ‘Russian Masters’

Mark Kanny
Courtesy of Yang Bao
Violinist Alexi Kenney will perform with the Westmoreland Symphony Orchestra as it opens its 51st season.
Courtesy of Westmoreland Symphony
Westmoreland Symphony artistic director Daniel Meyer will conduct Westmoreland Symphony Orchestra in “Russian Masters” to open the ensemble’s 51st season.

The Westmoreland Symphony is tuning up for the new season, including hiring a handful of new string players, to open with a splash by performing three of the most popular Russian composers.

“For me, Russian music is among the most colorful, most dramatic and the most challenging of all the repertoire,” says the orchestra’s music director, Daniel Meyer. “I love to get the orchestra stretched but also playing music that makes them sound really good at the start of the season.”

Meyer will conduct the Westmoreland Symphony Orchestra in “Russian Masters” to open the ensemble’s 51st season Oct. 12 at The Palace Theatre in Greensburg. The program is Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s “Polonaise” from his opera “Eugene Onegin,” Sergei Prokofiev’s Violin Concerto No. 2 with Alexi Kenney as soloist, and Dmitri Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 5.

The more popular of Prokofiev’s violin concertos was one of the first parts of the program Meyer decided upon, in part because he is eager to collaborate with Kenney. The young American violinist is active as a soloist and chamber music enthusiast. He won a 2016 Avery Fisher Career Grant and is a frequent guest concertmaster with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra.

“He has that wonderful combination of brilliant technique and also bristling and bubbling energy I thought would be perfect for this piece,” the conductor says. “That’s just how he lives his life. He exudes that spirit.”

Prokofiev wrote his Second Violin Concerto in 1935 for a French violinist, shortly before the composer resettled in his native land after nearly two decades in the West. It opens with a hauntingly lyrical solo for unaccompanied violin, and includes a wonderfully singing slow movement and exciting, Spanish-tinged finale, which includes castanets. The world premiere was in Madrid.

‘An attempt to save his life’

The Shostakovich Fifth Symphony was written only two years after Prokofiev’s violin concerto but occupies an entirely different psychological realm. Meyer says he wrote it as “an attempt to save his life,” and the composer’s life at the time was harrowing. He had been denounced by name and harshly as “an enemy of the people” in Pravda at a time when millions were being killed in dictator Joseph Stalin’s purges. Shostakovich later wrote that the fear he felt that the KGB would come for him in the middle of the night never left him.

“There’s a degree of desperation built into this piece that’s palpable and makes it even more interesting. For me, Stalin cast a shadow over the whole piece, especially the finale,” Meyer says.

Yet Shostakovich was so skilled a composer that his music could also sound like a heroic affirmation of the human spirit, more in line with the aesthetic tone Soviet authorities wanted. It’s didn’t hurt the composer’s attempt to survive when a critic called the symphony “a Soviet artist’s reply to just criticism.”

Both Prokofiev and Shostakovich were harshly attacked in state media in 1948. Prokofiev died on the same day as Stalin, March 5, 1953. But Shostakovich lived to drink in celebration of the tyrant’s death.

Mark Kanny is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

Categories: AandE | Music
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.