Latrobe’s Cabaret Theatre postpones ‘Cotton Patch Gospel’ run |
Theater & Arts

Latrobe’s Cabaret Theatre postpones ‘Cotton Patch Gospel’ run

Shirley McMarlin
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Cabaret Theatre founder and artistic director John Carosella announced that the Latrobe-based company’s production of “Cotton Patch Gospel,” originally scheduled to open July 10, has been rescheduled for October.

The Latrobe-based Cabaret Theatre has postponed its upcoming production of Harry Chapin’s “Cotton Patch Gospel.”

Originally scheduled to open July 10 and run through July 20, the production has been rescheduled for Oct. 16-26 in the Olde Main Theatre in Latrobe.

Artistic Director John Carosella cited “production difficulties” for the change.

“There are always production difficulties of one sort or another and most of them we handle, but this was a major one,” Carosella says. “It’s very difficult to produce a musical without a music director, and this show calls for very specific bluegrass-type music.

“If we can’t do a production well, we don’t do it, and getting the best music director and musicians possible will enable us to do this little gem of a show as well as we want to do it,” he adds.

“The musical is a re-telling of the Gospel of Matthew as it might have been told if the story had unfolded in the deep South — Gainesville, Ga., to be exact,” Carosella says. “Harry died in an automobile accident (in 1981) shortly after he completed work on the show and it was produced in New York after his death.”

Details: 724-527-7775

Shirley McMarlin is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Shirley at 724-836-5750, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.