ShareThis Page

Thought-provoking 'Doubt' takes Geyer Performing Arts Center stage

| Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
Rachel Carey of Mars (from left), Kat Post of Scottdale, Steven Ray of Pittsburgh and Monica Reed Kramer of Monessen rehearse for 'Doubt: A Parable,' by Actors and Artists of Fayette County March 8-11 at Geyer Performing Arts Center.
Rachel Carey of Mars (from left), Kat Post of Scottdale, Steven Ray of Pittsburgh and Monica Reed Kramer of Monessen rehearse for 'Doubt: A Parable,' by Actors and Artists of Fayette County March 8-11 at Geyer Performing Arts Center.

A powerful play that won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama and the Tony Award for best blay in 2005 makes its way to Geyer Performing Arts Center March 8-11 for four performances by Actors & Artists of Fayette County.

Earl “EJ” Christopher of Uniontown, who is directing “Doubt, a Parable” by John Patrick Shanley, says the production is unique in that “there are not a lot of shows anymore that really make you think. This is the show for that. By the end, you shouldn't be certain. That's the whole idea.”

The drama revolves around Sister Aloysius, the principal at St. Nicholas Catholic Church and School, who takes control of a situation when she suspects one of the priests, Father Flynn, has been having improper relations with one of the male students.

Kat Post of Scottdale portrays Sister Aloysius in a role she says causes her to search her heart and mind every day.

“After reading the script, I jumped at the opportunity to be involved in yet another drama about real life,” she says. “In addition to the light-hearted shows and musicals we often produce, I believe in giving our audience some meaty subjects to chew on throughout the year. ‘Doubt' is not only intense drama; it deals with a subject that we have been grappling with for decades: pedophilia.”

Post says the cast has been immersed in this difficult subject matter for two months “and it takes a toll. EJ, our director, is the glue that holds us together. He provides time for the cast to grow and bond together … and insightful notes, which promote deeper examination into ourselves, our character, and the other characters as we create this production.”

Stephen Ray, originally from Greensburg now living in Pittsburgh, is playing Father Flynn, whom he describes as a charismatic and powerful man at St. Nicholas Parish.

“He's relatively new to the parish, but he's made a home for himself and has become very popular with the parishioners and the students, and has a vision for a progressive and welcoming Catholic church,” Ray says.

Tackling the role of the accused priest is a matter of striking a balance in every performance for Ray.

“I have to have very purposeful intentions in my own mind, make clear decisions that I understand completely, while also not allowing the audience to feel certainty about anything. If I've done my job right, no one will be able to walk out saying they're confident they know the truth,” he says.

“Doubt” should leave its audiences weighing the options, according to Ray.

“I think they should walk out of the theater feeling profoundly unsettled,” he says. “The original cast for this show said that the second act of the show is the discussion that takes place amongst the audience members as they leave the building, and I think that's a fantastic way to put it. You should walk out feeling like you have an idea what the conclusion was, but you'll never be able to know.”

Christopher is intent on making sure elements of the Catholic church are presented accurately in this production.

“Even though doubt is obviously the main theme in the play, the Catholic church is where this ‘parable' takes place, so the accuracy is very necessary,” says the director. “In addition, helping the actors get into the true psychology of their characters has been quite the challenge as well, but they have not disappointed me yet.”

Candy Williams is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me