ShareThis Page

Fracking support grows with increased awareness, RMU poll shows

| Monday, June 15, 2015, 10:36 p.m.

Support for the use of fracking by the natural gas industry is growing with awareness despite concerns about potential damage to the environment, a new poll by Robert Morris University shows.

About 56 percent of 1,003 people polled nationwide said they support hydraulic fracturing from shale, up from 42 percent in November 2013. The increase tracked overall knowledge of the process, which grew to nearly 71 percent from 45 percent nationwide, and was up to nearly 74 percent among 529 Pennsylvania residents polled last month.

“It appears most of the awareness is driven from industry awareness,” said mechanical engineering professor Tony Kerzmann, who serves on the advisory board of the Robert Morris University Polling Institute.

The online poll, which was sponsored by Trib Total Media, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points for Pennsylvania results and plus or minus 3 percentage points for the national numbers.

More than 73 percent of national respondents (74 percent in Pennsylvania) said pulling gas from shale has the potential to help the economy, and 69 percent nationally said fracking will help the country move to energy independence.

Kerzmann noted that more knowledge of fracking — part of the overall extraction process — has brought awareness of its potential impacts. About 61 percent of respondents in the state and nationwide agreed that fracking can contaminate water supplies and 48.5 percent of those polled nationally (50 percent in Pennsylvania) agreed that methane released at well sites can contribute to climate change.

“It seems people are willing to accept short-term environmental issues and long-term climate effects,” Kerzmann said.

David Conti is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5802 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me