Canada accuses Facebook of breaking local privacy law, threatens lawsuit |

Canada accuses Facebook of breaking local privacy law, threatens lawsuit

The Washington Post

Canadian regulators on Thursday found that Facebook committed “serious” breaches of local laws over its mishandling of users’ personal information, announcing they would take the company to court to force it to change its privacy practices.

The new legal threat from Canada comes after federal authorities and regulators in British Columbia determined that Facebook had in place “superficial” protections for users’ data and failed to keep close watch over third-party apps that accessed that information.

Regulators began their investigation last year in response to Facebook’s entanglement with Cambridge Analytica, a political consultancy that improperly accessed the personal information of 87 million of the social site’s users. They said the incident would not have happened in the first place if Facebook had heeded their earlier warnings — dating to 2009 — and improved its privacy practices.

Canadian authorities said Thursday they sought in response to “implement measures to ensure the company respects its accountability and other privacy obligations in the future.” Facebook, however, “refused to voluntarily submit to audits of its privacy policies and practices over the next five years,” according to regulators. As a result, Canada’s top data-protection watchdog said it would seek an order in court to force Facebook to comply. Under current law, they said they lacked the ability to bring steep fines in response to Facebook’s violations.

“Facebook’s refusal to act responsibly is deeply troubling given the vast amount of sensitive personal information users have entrusted to this company,” Daniel Therrien, the privacy commissioner of Canada, said in a statement. “Their privacy framework was empty, and their vague terms were so elastic that they were not meaningful for privacy protection.”

Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.

The findings from Canada and British Columbia illustrate Facebook’s widening regulatory woes around the world. On Wednesday, the social-media giant said it would set aside $3 billion in anticipation that it could have to pay as much as $5 billion to settle a privacy investigation in the United States. The fine, first reported by the Post, could accompany a series of additional penalties targeting both Facebook and its chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg.

Earlier Thursday, Irish regulators said they had opened a new probe of Facebook — this time focused on reports that it mishandled passwords for hundreds of millions of users on Facebook and its photo-sharing app Instagram. The passwords had been stored in plain text, exposed to company employees, though Facebook has said there has been no evidence of abuse. The investigation is the eleventh such inquiry opened by Irish regulators, who have chief oversight of Facebook under tough new privacy rules implemented in Europe last year.

In Canada, regulators on Thursday said the “risk is high” their citizens’ data might be disclosed to third-party apps and used in ways they never intended as a result of Facebook’s refusal to implement any changes to its practices.

The country’s investigation began in March 2018, following initial reports that Cambridge Analytica — through a quiz app created by an outside researcher — harnessed social data on users and their interests in order to better target political messages at them. The app amassed data not only about those who downloaded it but about their friends, a form of collection Facebook had allowed on the site for years.

Canadian regulators said Facebook’s since-revised policy never had been clear to users. The disclosure had been presented once, at the time a user registered for Facebook, “in relation to disclosures that could occur years later,” in ways many may not have understood. And a user’s affected friends never might have been aware of how exactly their data had been used as a result.

Canadian authorities estimated that 622,000 local users had been affected by Cambridge Analytica’s efforts, though Facebook argued that there is “no known evidence” of that. To that end, Facebook rejected Canada’s conclusions, argued Canada had no authority to order a change in its policies, and opted against implementing any of the government’s recommendations, including new efforts to better inform users about the use of their data and the apps that may have accessed their information.

Under Canadian law, privacy watchdogs said they lacked the ability to force Facebook to comply or bring steep fines in response to its violations. Instead, companies like Facebook “can say to a regulator, ‘Thank you very much for your concern on matters of law but we actually disagree, and we will continue as we were,’” said Therrien, the country’s privacy commissioner, on a call with reporters. He called on Parliament to change the law. “It is completely unacceptable.”

Categories: Business | News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.