FDA says asbestos found in cosmetics at teen chain Claire’s | TribLIVE.com
Business Briefs

FDA says asbestos found in cosmetics at teen chain Claire’s

Associated Press
A Claire’s store is seen in New York in March 2018. The mall chain that has pierced the ears of millions of teens and recently emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection has removed three cosmetics products the Food and Drug Administration said it found asbestos in.

The Food and Drug Administration said it found asbestos in certain cosmetics sold by teen chain Claire’s.

A consumer alert issued Tuesday advised consumers not to use certain eye shadows, compact powders and contour palettes the agency said tested positive for asbestos, a carcinogen.

Claire’s, based in Hoffman Estates, Ill., said it removed the three products the agency identified from stores “out of an abundance of caution” but disputed the agency’s findings.

“There is no evidence that any products sold by Claire’s are unsafe,” the company said in a statement that said the FDA’s test results showed “significant errors.”

In late 2017, Claire’s stopped selling some products and hired a lab to conduct tests after a consumer claimed to have found asbestos in its makeup. Initial tests found no asbestos, Claire’s said at the time.

The three items identified by the FDA were “extensively tested by multiple independent accredited laboratories” in early 2018 and were found to follow all relevant safety regulations, Claire’s said Wednesday.

Claire’s also said it is removing all talc-based cosmetic products from stores and will honor returns of talc-based products.

The mineral, an ingredient in many cosmetic products, is often found near asbestos, which can lead to contamination, according to the FDA.

Claire’s, which sells jewelry, accessories and cosmetics, emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.