Fire-free zone in war between growth and value |
John Dorfman, Columnist

Fire-free zone in war between growth and value

Trader William Lawrence works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Monday, July 22, 2019. U.S. stocks moved higher in early trading Monday on Wall Street as investors snapped up technology stocks.

For more than two decades, I’ve been a value investor. In recent years, that’s been a handicap.

Growth investors are running the table. Growth stocks have beaten value stocks in seven of the past 10 years, winning by a large margin in the past two years.

The trend continued in the first quarter of this year. Growth stocks surged 16.18%, while value stocks advanced 11.93%.

We all know the investment world’s pendulum swings back and forth between value and growth. What we don’t know is when the next swing will occur.

Until it does, value investors would be wise to consider stocks that show both growth and value. Here are a few to consider.

America’s Car-Mart

America’s Car-Mart Inc. (CRMT) doesn’t get much respect. The company sells mainly older used cars to lower-income customers, virtually all of whom get a car loan to buy.

Glamorous? No. Yet America’s Car-Mart has grown its earnings at a 23% annual clip for the past five years, and has been profitable every year for at least 15 years. It has about 144 dealerships (independent but affiliated) in 11 states in the South-Central U.S.

At today’s price near $87, Car-Mart sells for 13 times earnings, and less than 1.0 times revenue — both multiples well below those of the overall market.

Applied Materials

A maker of semiconductor equipment, Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT) has grown its revenue at 22% a year the past five years, and increased earnings much faster.

Its five-year growth figures are superior to those of Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), yet Microsoft commands a stock price that is 28 times earnings, while Applied Materials fetches half that multiple — 14 times earnings.

I’m not saying that Applied Materials is a better company than Microsoft, which has many strengths and is immensely profitable. But I do think that Applied Materials is a good value here.

D.R. Horton

In 2011, the trough year for the U.S. housing market, builders completed 584,900 homes. In 2004-06, the last boom period for homebuilding, builders finished between 1.8 million and 2 million houses per year.

Today, we find ourselves in between those extremes, with 1.18 million houses built last year. I think the figure will gradually edge toward the 2 million mark. The big question is whether the millennial generation will want to be homebuyers.

I think they will. Granted, many are burdened with student debt. And many of them prefer urban (apartment) living. But as they hit their child-raising years, I think they will buy single-family homes in increasing numbers.

I like many of the homebuilders. D.R. Horton Inc. (DHI) is my current favorite because it builds mid-priced homes, has a decent balance sheet and sells for only 11 times recent earnings.

Marine Max

I believe that investors are skeptical that the economic recovery that began about 10 years ago can keep rolling. Boats are a luxury, so boat sales drop in recessions. And that’s why Marine Max Inc. (HZO), a boat retailer, sells for only nine times recent earnings.

I understand the skeptics’ case, but I think their issues are fairly fully reflected in the current stock price. Sales and earnings have grown very nicely the past five years — at a pace of 17% a year and 20% a year, respectively.

Past record

Today’s column is my 14th on stocks with both value and growth characteristics. The average gain of the first 13 columns was 13.7%, which compares favorably with 10.8% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same periods.

Ten of my 13 columns on this topic have been profitable, and eight have beaten the S&P 500.

Be aware that my column recommendations are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. Their results shouldn’t be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients. And past performance doesn’t predict future results.

Last year, my picks trailed the S&P, due mostly to losses in Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) and Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP). I had a loss of 1.5%, while the S&P 500 advanced 9.9%.


I own shares in D.R. Horton and Walgreens Boots Alliance for most clients and personally. A fund I manage has a short position in Molson Coors, instituted several months after my column appeared. A fund I manage owns call options on Applied materials.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.