ShareThis Page
GM needed help beating profit estimates, so it called a Lyft | TribLIVE.com
News

GM needed help beating profit estimates, so it called a Lyft

1093520_web1_ptr-GMotors-050119
AP
General Motors Co. needed a little help from ride-hailing company Lyft Inc. to beat analysts for first-quarter profit as cost cuts only partially made up for lower sales.

General Motors Co. needed a little help from ride-hailing company Lyft Inc. to beat analysts for first-quarter profit as cost cuts only partially made up for lower sales.

The Detroit-based company posted adjusted earnings of $1.41 a share for the first three months of the year, topping analysts’ average projection for $1.10. The 31-cent surprise, however, came entirely from the higher valuation of stakes in Lyft, which listed its stock in March, and French carmaker Peugeot SA, which has revived GM’s German castoff brand, Opel.

Without Lyft and Peugeot propping up profit, GM would have only met projections for lower profit. Net revenue fell to $34.9 billion and was more than a half-billion below what analysts were projecting. The company has been losing market share in North America as it’s killed off slower-selling sedans including the Chevrolet Cruze and taken months to roll out redesigned pickups.

“GM’s first-quarter operating results were in line with expectations,” GM Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra said in a statement. “My confidence in the year ahead remains strong, driven by our all-new full-size truck launch and our ongoing business transformation.”

GM shares fell as much as 2.4 percent to $38.83 as of 9:42 a.m. Tuesday in New York. The stock is up 16 percent this year.

Categories: Business | News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.