ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

Volkswagen owners push for quick fix or trial in emissions scandal

| Tuesday, April 19, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
FILE - In this Sept. 30, 2015, file photo, John Swanton, spokesman with the California Air Resources Board, explains how a 2013 Volkswagen Passat with a diesel engine is evaluated at the emissions test lab in El Monte, Calif. Lawyers for thousands of people who own diesel Volkswagens that cheat on emissions tests are asking a judge to order repairs and compensation if the company doesn't agree to a fix by Thursday, April 21, 2016. The request was made in a proposed agenda for hearing Thursday before U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. (AP Photo/Nick Ut, File)
FILE - In this Sept. 30, 2015, file photo, John Swanton, spokesman with the California Air Resources Board, explains how a 2013 Volkswagen Passat with a diesel engine is evaluated at the emissions test lab in El Monte, Calif. Lawyers for thousands of people who own diesel Volkswagens that cheat on emissions tests are asking a judge to order repairs and compensation if the company doesn't agree to a fix by Thursday, April 21, 2016. The request was made in a proposed agenda for hearing Thursday before U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. (AP Photo/Nick Ut, File)

DETROIT — Lawyers representing thousands of people who own diesel Volkswagens that cheat on emissions tests are asking a judge to order repairs and compensation if the company and government regulators don't agree to a fix by Thursday.

The request was made in a proposed agenda for hearing Thursday before Senior U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco.

It says the owners want an expedited hearing or a trial before the judge to get an order for “equitable relief” that would begin in July. Or they want a full trial that would include punitive damages against VW in the same time frame.

Volkswagen says in the document that it does not believe a hearing or trial is appropriate, apparently because progress is being made toward a fix and compensation. A solution could be revealed at Thursday's hearing.

Lawyers for the owners made the trial request in an effort to move the case along, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. The cases have lingered since last fall with the polluting cars still on the road, leaving owners to wonder if VW will buy them back or come up with a repair that will hurt their performance and fuel mileage.

The owners filed dozens of lawsuits against VW after it acknowledged in September that it intentionally defeated emissions tests and put dirty vehicles on the road. The cheating allowed cars to pass laboratory emissions tests while spewing harmful nitrogen oxide at up to 40 times the level allowed when operating on real roads.

“I think a lot depends on what progress has been made or whether the judge is satisfied, or whether he moves on to the proposals that the plaintiffs are offering,” Tobias said, adding that it might be difficult to be ready for a trial in July.

The first item on Thursday's agenda is a report on the status of fixing the cars and “related discussions.” It also includes a request to add the Federal Trade Commission to the case. The FTC has sued VW alleging deceptive advertising. The owners' lawyers also are seeking documents that Volkswagen provided to the law firm Jones Day, which the company has hired to investigate how the cheating happened.

Volkswagen and the Environmental Protection Agency, which has accused the company of cheating, would not comment on whether an agreement would be announced at Thursday's hearing.

California Air Resources Board enforcement chief Todd Sax said last month he doesn't think it's technically feasible to repair any of VW's 2-liter diesel engines, under the hoods of most of the models at issue, to meet that state's stringent clean air rules.

The Justice Department, which has sued VW on behalf of the EPA, said in the agenda document that it would withhold comment on the request for a trial until it finds out what claims and issues would be tried. A spokesman would not comment Tuesday.

A message was left Tuesday morning for Elizabeth Cabraser, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs.

During a hearing in March, Breyer said that VW and government regulators must present a detailed plan within a month on getting the cars to comply with clean air laws, or risk the possibility of a trial this summer. Breyer said he wants to know the timing of the fix and any planned payments to owners, among other details, by Thursday.

The judge also said that former FBI Director Robert Mueller told him Volkswagen, government regulators and attorneys for car owners had made substantial progress toward a resolution that would get the polluting cars off the road. He did not provide any details. Breyer appointed Mueller to oversee settlement talks.

The parties were not able to immediately announce the solution because engineering technicalities and other important issues still needed to be resolved, Breyer said Mueller told him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me