ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

Apple violated Chinese firm's patents, ruling says

| Friday, June 17, 2016, 11:00 p.m.

Beijing's patent regulator has ordered Apple to stop selling its iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus in the city because their design too closely resembles that of a Chinese phone.

Apple is appealing the ruling, which marks the latest challenge to the tech company in its second-largest market.

The two iPhone models violated design patents held by Chinese device maker Shenzhen Baili because of similarities in external design with the company's 100C phone, the Beijing Intellectual Property Office wrote in a statement on its website.

Apple said in a statement it will continue to sell those iPhone models in Beijing as it appeals the decision.

Because the ruling applies only to the sales within the city of Beijing, analysts doubt the ruling will affect Apple's bottom line.

“We do not think the case will have any negative impact on Apple's revenue and margin in China,” Amit Daryanani and Shawn Yuan of RBC Capital Markets wrote in a research report.

Analyst Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray said the spat illustrates the ongoing “friction between Apple and the Chinese government.”

“Even if they do get banned, they'll come out with new phones and they'll be selling those phones,” Munster said. “It's a little bit of a carnival going on between Apple and China.”

Apple shares were down 1.65 percent, to $95.91 as of midday Friday. Angelo Zino, equity analyst at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said the market's reaction shows investors aren't greatly concerned about the patent issue itself.

“Does it impact anything on the fundamentals today? No. Could it alarm investors of other issues that could potentially happen in the future?” he asked. “I think that's why maybe you see the stock trading where it is.”

Apple had to shut down its iBooks and iTunes Movies services in China in April because of violations of foreign publishing regulations.

In May, Apple lost the right to maintain exclusivity of the “iPhone” name, as a Beijing court ruled that an accessories maker could use it on a line of luxury leather goods.

While Apple jousts with the Chinese government, Chinese consumers have delighted in the company's products. Sales in Greater China — including mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan — amounted to 25 percent of Apple's revenue in the second fiscal quarter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me