ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

Can you trust in Wikipedia?

| Saturday, Oct. 8, 2016, 5:24 p.m.

Question: My daughter's homework assignment asked her to use Wikipedia as a source for her research. Is Wikipedia reliable?

Answer: Wikipedia contains a wealth of interesting information; however, it shouldn't be trusted as a reliable academic source. Content on Wikipedia is written collaboratively by anonymous users, which means anyone can contribute. The site does have a peer review process to prevent errors, but there have been several instances on Wikipedia where false information has been published. Talk to your daughter's teacher and recommend It uses the same concept as Wikipedia, except to contribute you must be a university faculty member or researcher. Any content they contribute is reviewed by other experts.

Free photo editing

Q: On your radio show, I heard you mention a free alternative to PhotoShop. What was that software called again?

A: Paint.NET is a cross between Photoshop and Windows' built-in MS Paint. This download was created as a free replacement for MS Paint. The tools are easy to use and include options to add text, patterns, shapes and gradients to any photo using layers. You can sharpen images, remove red eye and add effects such as motion blur.

For daily tips, free newsletters and more, visit

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me