ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

House Republicans want answers on VW settlements

| Tuesday, Nov. 1, 2016, 8:24 p.m.
(from left), Congressman Tim Murphy, talks with Greensburg Salem School District Board Director, Robin Savage, at the 41st Annual Westmoreland County Communiity Prayer Breakfast, held at the Ramada Hotel & Conference Center in Hempfield Township on Friday morning, January 29, 2016.
Kim Stepinsky | for TRIB TOTAL MEDIA
(from left), Congressman Tim Murphy, talks with Greensburg Salem School District Board Director, Robin Savage, at the 41st Annual Westmoreland County Communiity Prayer Breakfast, held at the Ramada Hotel & Conference Center in Hempfield Township on Friday morning, January 29, 2016.

WASHINGTON — Two senior House Republicans on Tuesday asked environmental regulators to answer questions about Volkswagen AG's diesel emissions settlements, including disclosing how the government calculated the penalties imposed on VW to offset excess pollution.

In a letter, Michigan Rep. Fred Upton, who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rep. Tim Murphy, Upper St. Clair, asked the Environmental Protection Agency to disclose how much excess pollution VW vehicles sold in the United States since 2009 have emitted. VW has agreed to spend $2.7 billion on efforts to offset the pollution.

The legislators also want information on the requirement that VW spend $2 billion over 10 years on zero-emission vehicle investments. Some electric vehicle-charging firms and others have raised concerns about the impact of the spending on the marketplace.

Volkswagen is ramping up its electric vehicle offerings and the automaker has not sold any diesel vehicles in the U.S. market since late 2015, when it admitted to installing secret software to evade emissions rules. The automaker has said it is uncertain if it will resume diesel sales.

“VW may be able to obtain substantial competitive benefits, if not a monopoly on electric vehicle infrastructure, under the required investments,” the letter said. “This is a curious outcome for the settlement of a cheating scandal.”

An EPA spokesman said the agency will review and respond to the letter.

The EPA has declined to say how much excess pollution it thinks the Volkswagen vehicles will emit or how much excess pollution will be offset under the $2.7 billion program.

Volkswagen spokeswoman Jeannine Ginivan declined to comment on the letter but noted that over the next four months the automaker will submit its zero emission outreach and infrastructure investment plan to state and federal regulators.

In total, the world's second-largest automaker has agreed to spend up to $16.5 billion in connection with the scandal, including payments to dealers, states and attorneys for owners.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco approved Volkswagen's $14.7 billion settlement with owners and regulators.

That agreement includes up to $10 billion to buy back as many as 475,000 polluting cars and the $4.7 billion for the zero emission and diesel pollution offset programs.

Volkswagen has also agreed to make up to $1.21 billion in payments to VW dealers and $600 million to 44 U.S. states to address some claims. It still faces billions more in costs to address 85,000 polluting 3.0-liter diesel-powered vehicles and Justice Department fines for violating clean air laws.

Volkswagen has been in talks over how much compensation it may offer owners of the larger 3.0-liter diesel vehicles that emit up to nine times legally allowable emissions and whether it will offer buybacks. It faces a court hearing Thursday on the issue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me