ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

Iowa man who complained of hometown's 'rancid dog food' odor sues city leaders

| Thursday, March 8, 2018, 6:18 p.m.
The Iowa Drying and Processing plant in Sibley, Iowa, specializes in the contract manufacturing and processing of food and feed grade products.
Iowa Drying and Processing
The Iowa Drying and Processing plant in Sibley, Iowa, specializes in the contract manufacturing and processing of food and feed grade products.

DES MOINES, Iowa — An Iowa man who said his hometown smelled like “rancid dog food” because of an animal food processing plant sued the city Thursday after he says they threatened to silence him.

Josh Harms with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa filed suit in U.S. District Court asking a judge to block Sibley officials from making legal threats or taking action to force him to remove criticism from his website.

Harms created a website titled “Should You Move to Sibley, Iowa?” to point out city officials' lack of action on the stench from Iowa Drying and Processing, which makes a high-protein animal food supplement from pig blood.

The company moved to a vacant building in Sibley in 2013 and Harms began publishing his protest website in 2015.

“We're not just talking an ‘oh, that was a little stinky' kind of smell. We're talking a rotten blood, stale beer, ‘I wonder if I should see a doctor after breathing that' wall of fumes,” he wrote. “The putrid air seemed to hang over much of the town for 3-4 days every week. It was particularly nasty on hot and humid summer days.”

In December, the city's attorney Daniel DeKoter sent Harms a letter saying Harms was hurting the community with his website. DeKoter claimed that a doctor declined to move to town after reading it and that his complaints interfered with recruitment of businesses and new residents and negatively affected property values.

“If the web site is not taken down within 10 days of the date of this letter, your next notice will be in the form of a lawsuit,” DeKoter wrote.

DeKoter told Harms that the city had sued the company and the odor problem was mostly solved. Harms said the odor may be better but remains a problem.

Harms said he fears that the government is targeting him.

“I want to use my skills as a web developer to protest and to help my community,” he said in a statement.

The lawsuit claims the city violated his constitutional right to free speech. He seeks an injunction halting the city from threatening or bringing a lawsuit against him and blocking his ability to speak to the press about how Sibley smells.

DeKoter said he wouldn't comment on the lawsuit.

The ACLU of Iowa Legal Director Rita Bettis said the organization has brought more than 100 free-speech cases since its founding in 1935 and such cases are at the heart of protecting civil liberties. She said government officials at every level, even small Iowa cities, exist to protect the rights of the people and should know core First Amendment rights.

“There is nothing more American or patriotic than protesting the government, so we're proud at the ACLU of Iowa to stand up for Josh's rights to do so,” she said.

Sibley is a town of 2,600 people about 238 miles northwest of Des Moines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me