ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

Auto industry urges U.S. to hit brakes on proposed car tariffs

| Friday, July 20, 2018, 6:54 a.m.
Marshall Miller, president of Miller and Company, holds up a photo of a vintage truck that he said was affected by previous U.S. tariffs, while speaking during a Commerce Department hearing on investigation into whether auto imports threaten national security, Thursday, July 19, 2018, at the Commerce Department in Washington. The Commerce Department holds a daylong hearing on the latest trade fight the Trump administration is primed to start: It wants to impose tariffs on imported autos and auto parts, a move that President Donald Trump says would aid American workers but that could inflate car prices, make U.S. manufacturers less competitive and draw retaliation from other nations.
Marshall Miller, president of Miller and Company, holds up a photo of a vintage truck that he said was affected by previous U.S. tariffs, while speaking during a Commerce Department hearing on investigation into whether auto imports threaten national security, Thursday, July 19, 2018, at the Commerce Department in Washington. The Commerce Department holds a daylong hearing on the latest trade fight the Trump administration is primed to start: It wants to impose tariffs on imported autos and auto parts, a move that President Donald Trump says would aid American workers but that could inflate car prices, make U.S. manufacturers less competitive and draw retaliation from other nations.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Commerce Department sought feedback on President Donald Trump’s plans to consider taxing auto imports. It got an earful at an all-day hearing Thursday.

Critics lined up to urge the administration to reject auto tariffs. They argued that the taxes would raise car prices, squeeze automakers by increasing the cost of imported components and invite retaliation from U.S. trading partners — and allies — like the European Union and Canada.

Jennifer Thomas of the Alliance of Auto Manufacturers registered her organization’s opposition to levies on car, truck and auto parts imports. She noted that “our view is shared by over 2,200 comments that were filed before this hearing. In fact, we were only able to find three organizations” in favor of pursuing the tariffs.

Trump has ordered Commerce to investigate whether auto imports pose a threat to U.S. national security that would justify tariffs or other trade restrictions. Earlier this year, he used national security as a justification for taxing imported steel and aluminum.

Auto tariffs would escalate global trade tension dramatically: The U.S. last year imported $192 billion in vehicles and $143 billion in auto parts — figures that dwarf last year’s $29 billion in steel and $23 billion in aluminum imports. Not to mention the $34 billion in Chinese goods the administration has so far hit with tariffs in yet another dispute over the predatory practices China deploys in a push to challenge U.S. high-tech dominance.

Nearly 98 percent of the cars and trucks that would be hit by the tariffs are imported from U.S. allies: the EU, Canada, Japan, Mexico and South Korea, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics. David O’Sullivan, the EU’s ambassador to Washington, said it was “absurd” to think that imports from staunch allies undermine America’s national defense.

In a study out Thursday, the Center for Automotive Research found that a 25 percent tariff on autos and parts would cut U.S. auto sales by 2 million and wipe out 714,700 jobs. It would also raise the price of the typical new car sold in the United States (now about $35,000) by $4,400 — $2,270 for U.S.-built cars and $6,875 for imported cars and trucks.

“New tariffs or quotas would also reduce competition and consumer choice; increase the cost of used vehicles; and raise the cost of getting vehicles serviced and repaired,” said Peter Welch, president of the National Automobile Dealers Association, which commissioned the study.

Welch said the tariffs would push the average new-car payment to $611 a month from $533 a month (over 69 months on average).

John Hall, a maintenance worker at the Hyundai Motor Manufacturing plant in Montgomery, Alabama, testified that auto imports pose no threat to U.S. national security. “In fact, it’s just the opposite,” he said. Hyundai imports parts that go into its Alabama-built cars.

“New tariffs on automotive imports would have a devastating effect,” Hall said. “I am one of thousands of American workers whose livelihoods would be put at risk by a substantial tariff on automotive goods. It would not be possible to change our supply chain overnight, and a 25 percent tariff on parts would raise production costs at our Alabama factory by about 10 percent annually.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me