ShareThis Page
Business Headlines

Credit card swipe fee settlement falling apart over objections by retailers

| Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 9:33 p.m.

Legal settlements usually settle disputes, but a proposed $7.25 billion class-action settlement involving Visa and MasterCard appears to be erupting into a whole new battle over the fees retailers have to pay when consumers pull out their plastic.

Scores of angry retailers — from Wal-Mart and Starbucks to Target and Domino's Pizza — opted out of the historic settlement by last week's deadline and filed formal objections for U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in Brooklyn to consider. Some, such as Target Corp. and Macy's Inc., have struck back with a new lawsuit seeking damages.

They are walking away from what's regarded as the largest private antitrust class-action settlement in the nation's history, one that involves more than 7 million businesses — just about every entity that swiped a Visa or MasterCard credit or debit card since 2004.

“It's extraordinarily rare for a class settlement to be rejected because of concerns raised by class members,” said David Fink of Fink and Associates Law in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., who specializes in class-action litigation.

At the heart of the battle are allegations that Visa, MasterCard and a group of card-issuing banks illegally colluded since 2004 to fix the swipe fees merchants pay to process cards. The interchange fees average about 2 percent of every purchase at the register and total about $30 billion a year.

Many retailers say the swipe fees rival their health care costs as a significant operating expense. The National Retail Federation estimates the swipe fees drive up consumer costs by more than $250 a year for the average household.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me