John Dorfman: Another tool for your investment toolkit |
John Dorfman, Columnist

John Dorfman: Another tool for your investment toolkit

Traders Tommy Kalikas (left) and Peter Tuchman work Monday on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Technology stocks were leading indexes higher on Wall Street after the U.S. gave Chinese telecom giant Huawei another 90 days to buy equipment from American suppliers.

“Scalpel please, nurse. Clamp … sponge.”

A surgeon needs a variety of instruments. Investors should use a variety of tools, too.

One tool is underutilized by individual investors is the price/cash-flow ratio.

How cash flow works

Cash flow attempts to measure the actual money coursing through the arteries and veins of a business. Some analysts consider it synonymous with EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

“Earnings” are profits. “Before” in this context means “disregarding.”

Interest is a function of a firm’s financial structure. Taxes are a function of its regulatory environment. They don’t measure the strength of the underlying operating business.

Depreciation and amortization are accounting entries that often don’t reflect actual cash receipts or expenditures.

That’s why, to measure a business’s “cash flow,” analysts add back those four items to reported earnings.

Many analysts go a step further and measure “free cash flow.” They subtract the capital expenditures (such as new planes for an airline) necessary to keep a business going.

Cash flow is especially important to companies looking to acquire other companies. Once the whale swallows the minnow (or vice versa), variables such as interest and taxes may change radically. What the acquirer cares about is the strength of the business itself.

19% return

Every August from 1999 through 2006 and from 2012 to the present, I’ve written a column on stocks that look good based on price to cash flow. The average return on those 15 previous columns has been 19.4%.

That dwarfs the 8.4% average return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same 15 periods. Eleven of the 15 columns have been profitable, and 10 have beaten the index.

Last year, no dice. I had one small gainer and four losers, for an aggregate loss of 11.8%. The S&P 500 meanwhile gained 2.5%. My biggest loser was Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP), down 23%.

Bear in mind my column recommendations are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. Their results shouldn’t be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients. And past performance doesn’t predict future results.

Here are a few stocks that look good to me now, based on price to cash flow.

Charles Schwab

Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) is one of the most successful discount brokerage houses in the U.S. Its book value (net worth) has grown with great consistency, increasing 12% to 13% in the past year, the past five years and the past decade.

Schwab shares sell for about six times free cash flow. By contrast, the average stock these days sells for about 18 times free cash flow.

Holly Frontier

Holly Frontier Corp. (HFC), based in Dallas, operates refineries in Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming. Its stock price has fluctuated wildly the past six years, but shown no net progress.

There’s not much growth here, yet this is a solid business. It has shown an annual loss only once (2016) in the past 15 years. The company is known for its ability to process heavy oil (dense high-sulfur petroleum) into gasoline, jet fuel and other products. The stock sells for five times free cash flow.

RMR Group

RMR Group Inc. (RMR), based in my hometown of Newton, Mass., manages more than 1,500 real-estate properties and also operates real-estate investment trusts.

The stock has been publicly traded for only a few years. It did well initially but has fizzled in the past 12 months. Yet earnings have grown nicely. The shares sell for four times free cash flow.


Xerox Holdings Corp. (XRX) shares rose 43% this year through Aug. 26, making it one of the market’s best-performing stocks. The company, which used to be the monarch of copiers and printers, has been striving to reinvent itself.

It now gets most of its revenue from servicing office machines, but it also venturing into new areas such a 3-D printing. With so much uncertainty surrounding it, the stock sells for only six times free cash flow.

Warrior Met Coal

Coal mining is a buggy-whip industry, doomed to obsolescence in my view. But it still supplies a good many U.S. power plants, and the industry will take a long time to die.

In the meantime, some coal stocks are so cheap that I believe they are good buys, even though the long-term outlook looks bleak. One that is quite cheap is Warrior Met Coal Inc. (HCC), which sells for 2.2 times free cash flow.

Disclosure: I changed my mind about Molson Coors in recent months. A fund I manage now has a short position on it, betting on a decline. I have no positions for myself or clients in the other stocks mentioned today.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.