John Dorfman: Retired farmer wins big in short-selling contest |
John Dorfman, Columnist

John Dorfman: Retired farmer wins big in short-selling contest


Lloyd Dawson, a retired farmer from LaVista, Neb., beat a strong field to win my 16th annual “Short Sellers Don’t Have Horns” short-selling contest.

Short selling is a technique for profiting from a stock’s decline. It is difficult since the market rises more often than it falls. It is also dangerous because losses on a short sale are potentially unlimited, while on a normal investment you can’t lose more than you put in.

In my latest contest, eight of the nine contestants successfully picked a stock that declined. That 89% success rate was the best in the 16-year history of the contest. The previous best showing was 88% in the 2000-01 contest — a period when the market fell substantially. This time the market was up.

Dawson’s win

In September a year ago, Dawson picked Windstream Holdings Inc. (WINMQ) as a stock poised to decline.

“It was a landline phone company, losing a lot of business to mobile phones,” he says.

Windstream stock fell 95%, to about 26 cents, on Sept. 13 (the day the contest ended) from $5.22 on Oct. 2, 2018 (the day it began). In February, Windstream, which is based in Little Rock, Ark., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Based on the same rationale, Dawson suggests that CenturyLink Inc. (CTL), based in Monroe, La., might be a good stock to sell short in the coming 12 months.

How it works

A short seller — we’ll call her Jane Negative — borrows shares of a stock from a brokerage house and sells them. At some point, she must buy the shares back, which is called “covering the short.”

If the stock that Jane Negative shorted falls before she buys it back, she profits. She has bought low and sold high, only in reverse order.

Critics such as Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla Inc., like to blast short sellers. Musk has called them “value destroyers” and has suggested that short selling should be illegal. Other critics say that short sellers spread vicious, untrue rumors.

I believe that short selling is legitimate and useful. It helps keep naïve investors from overpaying for overhyped stocks. As for false rumors, those are spread by traditional “long” investors as well as by shorts.

That’s why I sponsor an annual short-selling contest and call it “Short Sellers Don’t Have Horns.”

DeFilippo second

Peter DeFilippo, an accountant for Bayer who hails from McDonald, Pa., came in second this year. He has won the contest twice in the past.

In the latest contest, DeFilippo picked CleanSpark Inc. (CLSK) as likely to fall. And fall it did, to the tune of 81%. Based in Bountiful, Utah, CleanSpark sells equipment and software to control energy flows.

DeFilippo found CleanSpark by looking for stocks that were selling for move than 100 times revenue and 100 times book value. Despite his great success in this contest, he says, “I have never shorted a stock in my life.”

For the coming year, DeFillipo thinks Pier 1 Imports (PIR) stock is a good bet to drop. He notes that the company’s cash is at a low ebb (about $30 million), while long-term debt and capital leases amount to about $1 billion.

Condon third

Laurent Condon, a retired trader in Blanaz, France, who won last year’s contest, placed third this year. His choice, Tilray Inc. (TLRY), a Canadian marijuana stock, declined 77%, giving him as a short seller (at least in theory) an equivalent gain.

Anticipating dramatic growth in cannabis sales now that many U.S. states are legalizing it, investors bid up marijuana stocks to fat valuations. And yet, Condon said, old-fashioned tobacco stocks are likely to “win the new legal cannabis sector.”

I couldn’t reach Condon over the weekend, but I look forward to hearing his next pick.

Want to play?

If you’d like to try your hand at short selling, without necessarily risking real money, enter my next contest.

Entries must be emailed or postmarked by the end of September. Send them to [email protected] or John Dorfman, Dorfman Value Management, 379 Elliot St., Newton Upper Falls, MA 02464.

The stock you sell short must be that of a U.S. company.

All entries should include:

• Your name

• Your address

• Your occupation

• Your email address

• Your weekday and weekend phone number in case you win and I need to interview you.

• A U.S.-based stock you expect to decline and a brief explanation of why you think so.

The next contest runs from Oct. 1, 2019, to Sept. 16, 2020.

Disclosure: I have no positions in the stocks discussed in today’s column, personally or for clients.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.