ShareThis Page
John Dorfman: Williams-Sonoma and Movado at inflection point | TribLIVE.com
John Dorfman, Columnist

John Dorfman: Williams-Sonoma and Movado at inflection point

John Dorfman
| Monday, February 25, 2019 9:53 p.m
801113_web1_791254-45ad52901f2e4ca19e8d7579a67f27e7
AP
Trader Neil Catania, left, and specialist Dilip Patel work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Friday, Feb. 22, 2019. Stocks are opening higher on Wall Street, led by gains in technology and health care companies.
801113_web1_sig-johndorman
Julia Malakie | Bloomberg News
Bloomberg News columnist, John Dorfman, smiles on July 28, 1999 in Newton, MA.

If you want an edge in investing, one path is to find companies whose stocks are cheap but whose profits are improving.

I went hunting for some this weekend, and found a few, including Williams-Sonoma Inc. (WSM) and Movado Group Inc. (MOV).

To qualify for consideration in today’s column, a stock had to jump a few hurdles:

• U.S. based market value of $300 million or more.

• Stock price no more than 15 times per-share earnings.

• Debt less than stockholders’ equity.

• Earnings growth at least 15 percent in the past 12 months, accelerating from a pace of 1 to 12 percent in the previous five years.

Williams-Sonoma

Williams-Sonoma jumped those hurdles and looked good doing it. The retailer of kitchenware and home furnishings boasted a very handsome return on stockholders’ equity of 24 percent in its fiscal year through Jan. 31, 2018.

Yet its stock has been unrewarding, dropping from about $85 in mid-2015 to about $56 now.

The company, based in San Francisco, sells its goods under the Williams Sonoma and Pottery Barn brands, among others. Sales have been rising gently, and should hit $5.6 billion this year. Analysts expect earnings to grow more than 19 percent this year, up from a 5 percent gain last year.

Wall Street holds the company in disdain. Twenty-four analysts cover it but only two call it a “buy.” I differ from the consensus here. One reason I like Williams-Sonoma is that it has a high Piotroski score — a measure that takes into account the quality of a company’s earnings.

Movado

Do you have a Movado watch? Are you sure? In addition to the Movado brand, the company sells watches under the brands Concord, Ebel, Hugo Boss, Juicy Couture, Lacoste and Tommy Hilfiger. Most of the watches are made in Switzerland; they are sold worldwide.

Competition from smart watches, notably Apple’s, has smashed the stock. From above $50 in mid-2018, it has melted down to about $34.

Sales dipped in 2017-18, but analysts expect record sales and earnings this year and next. I find the stock quite attractive at the current multiples of 12 times earnings and 1.3 times revenue.

International Bancshares

Since I like to be contrarian, I’m drawn to International Bancshares Corp. (IBOC), which has about 200 bank branches in southern and southeastern Texas. Much of its business is tied to U.S.-Mexico trade, and a good chunk of its deposits come from Mexico.

You’d think that President Trump’s making Mexico his political whipping boy would have hurt International Bancshares. But the stock has held up fairly well. It’s at $40, not far from its all-time high near $47 in September. Earnings in the latest reported quarter (through Sept. 30) were up 30 percent from the previous year.

My friend Bernie Horn’s firm, Polaris Capital, owns more than a million shares of the stock, which adds somewhat to my conviction here. I regard Horn as an astute international manager.

As for the tensions — over trade and otherwise — between the United States and Mexico, I believe they constitute bad news that is real but temporary. That’s the kind of bad news that can furnish a good entry point for an investment.

Cato

Cato Corp. (CATO), a clothing retailer based in Charlotte, N.C., aims to sell fashionable clothes to women at a medium-to-low price point. It operates about 1,300 stores in 30 states, with Texas, North Carolina and Georgia accounting for a large share of sales.

The past three quarters have shown nice jumps in Cato’s profits compared to a year ago.

On the minus side, Cato’s rich dividend yield of 8.7 percent seems headed for a cut, because the company is paying out more in dividends than it’s making. On the plus side, Cato is debt- free, a quality I relish.

Past Results

This is the fourth column I’ve written attempting to find stocks at inflection points. Results so far are nothing to write home about. The average 12-month return has been 8.7 percent — respectable, but well below the 14.4 percent racked up by the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index in the same three periods.

My inflection point picks have been profitable two times out of three, but have yet to beat the S&P 500.

Bear in mind that my column recommendations are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. Their results shouldn’t be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients. And past performance doesn’t predict future results. Disclosure: I have no positions in the stocks discussed in today’s column, personally or for clients.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.