Met Life, Oasis Petroleum selling below book value |
John Dorfman, Columnist

Met Life, Oasis Petroleum selling below book value

What do Met Life, Kelly Services and Oasis Petroleum have in common?

Each is selling below book value.

Book value is a company’s net worth (assets minus liabilities), usually expressed as a figure per share of stock outstanding. Buying stocks below book value is a classic bargain hunters’ strategy.

Here are five below-book stocks that I like.

Met Life

The largest U.S. company currently selling below book value is Met Life Inc. (MET), a big life insurance company. Its market value is about $45 billion. Its book value is about $52 billion, and annual revenue runs about $68 billion.

Investing the float — the money that comes in as premiums, and hasn’t yet been paid out as claims — is a bread-and-butter item for insurers. Investors have soured on insurers because, with interest rates low on relatively safe bonds, they don’t earn as much investment income as they once did.

To this I say, yes, but $17 billion in net investment income (last year’s figure) isn’t so bad. The stock trades at seven times earnings and 0.68 times book value.


Kelly Services Inc. (KELYA) is one of the leading temporary-help companies in the U.S. It has been profitable in 13 of the past 15 years — all but recession-scarred 2008-09.

Kelly reported good results for its June quarter, but only a so-so September quarter. The stock, at about $22, is trading for only 0.70 times book. Wall Street has all but abandoned coverage.

The company has little debt, and its profit margin has expanded recently.


Especially cheap at 0.26 times book is Oasis Petroleum Inc. (OAS), of Houston, Texas. It drills for oil and gas mostly in North Dakota, and also in Montana and Texas.

Five to six years ago, Oasis sometimes traded above $50. Today, in the fifth year of a slump for the energy industry, it languishes at $3.10.

Of 32 Wall Street analysts who cover Oasis, 22 rate it a “buy” and 10 call it a “hold.” Granting that hold ratings are often “sell” ratings in disguise, this is still a surprisingly strong analyst profile for a company in an out-of-favor industry.

I like that Oasis has managed to pare its debt somewhat, while increasing production. The stock must be considered a speculation, as the company posted losses in three of the past four years.


Greenbrier Cos. (GBX), out of Lake Oswego, Ore., manufactures and leases railroad cars. It had been No. 2 in the field behind Trinity Industries. Now, after acquiring rival American Railcar, it is about on par with Trinity in size.

For shippers, the railcar companies often function like fleet managers, getting the right number of cars to the right place, hopefully at the right time. While the railcar manufacturing is very capital intensive, the leasing and fleet management business isn’t.

Greenbrier shares trade for 0.87 times book value.


As a speculation, I like Sims Metal Management Inc. (SMSFY), a metals recycler based in Rye, N.Y., that does business worldwide, especially in the U.S. and Australia.

Sims has posted losses in five of the past 15 years, so it’s not surprising that the stock is cheap. The present price of $6.86 seems to discount a lot of woes: 13 times earnings, 0.29 times revenue and 0.87 times book value.

Wall Street doesn’t bother to cover Simms. If the company’s results perk up a bit, some firms might start or resume coverage. That would help the stock, which trades near its price during the Great Recession.

17% average

Since 1998, I’ve written 18 columns on stocks selling for a low price-to-book ratio. (Today’s is the 19th.) The average one-year gain on my recommendations in this series has been 17.75%, which is well above the 10.28% average for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same periods.

Twelve of the 18 columns beat the S&P 500, and thirteen were profitable.

Bear in mind that my column recommendations are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. Their results shouldn’t be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients. And past performance doesn’t predict future results.

Last year, my low price-to-book choices did well, thanks to a 161% gain in Ultra Clean Holdings Inc. (UCTT). My recommendation of Transocean Ltd. (RIG) bombed, with a nearly 45% loss.

In between were Loews Corp. (L), up about 5%, and Bank OZK (OZK) with a 15% gain. The average for my 2018-19 picks was a gain of 34%, compared with a little less than 16% for the benchmark index.

Disclosure: I own Greenbrier shares personally and for some of my clients.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.