ShareThis Page
Micron and Systemax make this year’s Casualty List |
John Dorfman, Columnist

Micron and Systemax make this year’s Casualty List

John Dorfman

A harsh December capped a hard fourth quarter for stocks. Many good companies have been knocked down, some to bargain levels.

I’ve picked four of them for my Casualty List, a quarterly compilation of wounded stocks that I believe may recover strongly.

The Casualty List has a profitable track record. This is the 63rd one. One-year returns can be calculated for 59 of them, and have averaged 19.01 percent. That compares to an average of 9.91 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same 59 periods. Figures are total returns including dividends.

My picks are far from infallible. They have been profitable 41 times out of 59 and have beaten the S&P 500 33 times.

Bear in mind that my column recommendations are theoretical and don’t reflect actual trades, trading costs or taxes. Their results shouldn’t be confused with the performance of portfolios I manage for clients. And past performance doesn’t predict future results.

If the goal is to buy low and sell high, it’s logical to look at stocks that have been whacked. Here are four new ones.


Timing is vital with Micron Technology Inc. (MU), which has a history of huge moves. It was up 300 percent in 2009, and 243 percent in 2013. But it fell 68 percent in 2002 and 64 percent in 2008.

Right now, investors loathe the memory-chip maker, fearing that chip makers are entering a down cycle. The stock — down 30 percent last quarter — sits at about $36, compared to about $57 last May.

I believe investors are overreacting. Profits were near $12 a share last year and are expected to drop below $7 in 2020. Suppose it’s even worse than analysts project, and earnings fall to $5 a share. The current stock price is only seven times that figure. Looks like a bargain to me.


The public knows Systemax Inc. (SYX) mainly as a retailer of personal computers, computer accessories and mobile phone gear. It sells by catalog, the internet and retail stores. The majority of its revenue, however, comes from selling industrial equipment, including materials-handling machines.

Not well known, and on the small side (with a market value of $900 million), Systemax stands out because it is debt- free, had an astounding 80 percent return on stockholders’ equity in 2017 and sells for a mere seven times earnings.

Down 27 percent last quarter, Systemax is barely followed on Wall Street. Only two analysts follow it; both call it a “buy.”

Live Oak

Down 44 percent last quarter was Live Oak Bancshares Inc. (LOB), based in Wilmington, N.C. It specializes in lending to small businesses such as veterinarians, pharmacies and funeral homes.

This bank looks good on net interest margin (the spread between the rate it pays on deposits and the rate it gets on loans). Its return on assets is also high. Those are two of my favorite measures in evaluating bank stocks.

Like Systemax, Live Oak is little covered by Wall Street or the Financial Press. It has been publicly traded only since July 2015. The current stock price, near $16, is a dollar below the initial offering price.


An astounding 64 percent drop in the fourth quarter left shares in McDermott International Inc. (MDR) at less than $7, down from $22 at the end of 2015. It has since bounced back to about $9.

This engineering and construction firm gets a large chunk of its revenue from Saudi Arabia. As many people believe that the crown prince of Saudi Arabia was complicit in the murder of a U.S.-based journalist, investors are highly concerned.

Even before that problem erupted, investors were unenthusiastic. Profits are puny of late, and earnings were negative in 2013-15.

Yet, the stock price seems to fully incorporate all the bad news. Shares go for 0.23 times revenue and 0.45 times book value (corporate net worth per share). I think it is so cheap that it can rise even if Saudi business drops a lot.

Last year

I mentioned earlier that my Casualty List picks aren’t infallible. In the past 12 months, they did badly.

All four of my picks fell more than the S&P 500, which declined 3.91 percent from Jan. 16, 2018, through Jan. 16.

Argan Inc. (AGX), Gilead Sciences Inc. (GILD) and CVS Health Inc. (CVS) were down 10 percent to 17 percent. The big loser was Owens & Minor Inc., down 63 percent. The four picks combined lost 26 percent.

Disclosure: I own Argan and Gilead for one client and CVS Health for a couple of clients. I don’t personally own any of the stocks discussed in today’s column.

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached at

John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments LLC in Newton Upper Falls, Mass., and a syndicated columnist. His firm or clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.