PSU study: Fake smiling at work can lead you to drink more off the job |

PSU study: Fake smiling at work can lead you to drink more off the job

Chris Pastrick
Faking a smile or suppressing negativity at the office could lead you to drink more off the clock, says a new study.

Faking it at work can drive a person to drink.

That’s what Penn State researchers found out in a new study published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.

The PSU team — along with researchers from the University at Buffalo — looked into the drinking habits of people who work with the public (food service workers, nurses, teachers). What they found was that those who forced themselves to act happy and suppress their negative emotions at the office had higher instances of heavy drinking when they went home.

That whole “service with a smile” concept might be in need of revision, says Alicia Grandey, professor of psychology at Penn State.

“Smiling as part of your job sounds like a really positive thing, but doing it all day can be draining,” Grandey told Penn State News. “In these jobs, there’s also often money tied to showing positive emotions and holding back negative feelings. Money gives you a motivation to override your natural tendencies, but doing it all day can be wearing.”

Faking it seems to take its toll. Grandey suggests perhaps employees use too much self-control at work, leaving them less to resist the urge to drink.

“It wasn’t just feeling badly that makes them reach for a drink,” Grandey says. “Instead, the more they have to control negative emotions at work, the less they are able to control their alcohol intake after work.”

Researchers compiled data from phone interviews with 1,592 U.S. workers. Those interviews were part of a larger study by the National Institutes of Health. Subjects talked about how often they faked or suppressed emotions — called “surface acting” — and how often and much they consumed alcohol after working hours.

The results also took into account how much a worker is in command of what they do.

“The relationship between surface acting and drinking after work was stronger for people who are impulsive or who lack personal control over behavior at work,” Grandey says. “If you’re impulsive or constantly told how to do your job, it may be harder to rein in your emotions all day, and when you get home, you don’t have that self-control to stop after one drink.”

However, for those workers who find their job personally rewarding don’t seem to have the same drinking problems.

“Nurses, for example, may amplify or fake their emotions for clear reasons,” Grandey said. “They’re trying to comfort a patient or build a strong relationship. But someone who is faking emotions for a customer they may never see again, that may not be as rewarding, and may ultimately be more draining or demanding.”

Is there any hope for on-the-job smile fakers?

“Employers may want to consider allowing employees to have a little more autonomy at work, like they have some kind of choice on the job,” Grandey says. “And when the emotional effort is clearly linked to financial or relational rewards, the effects aren’t so bad.”

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Business | News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.