ShareThis Page

Internet, phone make people happier, report says

| Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, 8:57 a.m.

If money can't buy happiness, it can buy a mobile phone and internet access, and that apparently makes a lot of people happier, according to a report by Gallup and the GSM Association, a mobile industry trade group.

While the report stresses the role mobile phones play in improving people's views of their lives, the data from Gallup's polling suggests internet access may be the more important factor.

The study's authors acknowledge that near the bottom of the article reporting the results.

“Given the innumerable ways the internet has expanded human capabilities, it is perhaps no surprise that the most substantial well-being gains are associated with online access,” they say.

In the Gallup World Poll, people in 142 countries were asked to rate how good their lives were from zero to 10, with 10 being the best.

People without mobile phones or internet access gave an average response of 4.59 while those with both gave an average response of 5.92.

However, those with a mobile phone but no internet access gave their lives an average rating of 4.65 while those with internet access but no mobile phone gave their lives an average rating of 5.83.

A second survey that asked people which emotions they experienced in the previous day produced similar results. All the positive emotions they report push the score up while the negative emotions pull it down to give a final score.

People without a mobile phone or internet access had an average score of 1.20; those with a mobile phone but no internet access averaged 1.31.

People with internet access but no mobile phone averaged 1.54 and those with both averaged 1.77.

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1218, or via Twitter @TribBrian.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me