ShareThis Page
Technology

'Shark Tank' said no, Amazon says yes to doorbell startup Ring

| Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2018, 7:54 a.m.
Amazon Echo and Echo Plus devices, behind, sit near illuminated Echo Button devices during an event announcing several new Amazon products by the company in Seattle. Amazon is expanding its home-security business by buying Ring, the maker of Wi-Fi-connected doorbells.
Associated Press
Amazon Echo and Echo Plus devices, behind, sit near illuminated Echo Button devices during an event announcing several new Amazon products by the company in Seattle. Amazon is expanding its home-security business by buying Ring, the maker of Wi-Fi-connected doorbells.

If Amazon succeeds in turning Alexa into the brains of the modern smart home, then Ring will provide the eyes.

In a deal that expands Amazon's network of internet-connected household gadgets — and with it, the e-commerce giant's reach into customers' homes — the Seattle company has agreed to buy Ring, a Santa Monica maker of high-tech doorbells, for a reported $1 billion.

Ring doorbells are already being used by 2 million customers. Its improbable success comes five years after its founder, serial entrepreneur Jamie Siminoff, was rejected on the TV show "Shark Tank," whose panel includes Pittsburgh native Mark Cuban.

But the company proved there was demand for video-enabled doorbells, which enable users to see outside their homes via smartphone or computer. The technology provides a sense of security and a salve for one of the most nagging problems in the e-commerce era: package thieves.

That's a huge benefit for Amazon, which has revolutionized the way people shop and the way goods are delivered.

But there's more to this acquisition than protecting parcels, analysts say.

Amazon has been quietly acquiring technology to bolster its smart home capabilities.

Amazon in recent years has focused extensively on Alexa, the popular home speaker that doubles as an artificial intelligence device that can answer questions and make Amazon purchases. In 2015, the company acquired smart lawn sprinkler company Rachio. That same year, it also acquired home security company Scout Alarm.

"Amazon's really watering the grass, so to speak, to grow into our homes and become more integrated in our lives in ways we haven't even fathomed yet," said Matt Schreiber, president and chief investment strategist at WBI. "This isn't just about Ring's doorbell technology. It ties into all the acquisitions they've quietly made over the years.

"They've envisioned Alexa as your personal assistant, as your butler, as the hired help without having a hired help. This is the help for everyone on the planet, and they're not done yet."

With investments in so many industries — retail, grocery, hardware, AI — it's not a stretch to imagine a future where someone can tell Alexa to buy groceries, a delivery worker can pick up the food from an Amazon-owned Whole Foods, and a customer can monitor doorstep delivery via Ring.

"This is like 'I, Robot,' " Schreiber said, referring to the 2004 science fiction film in which humans create robots to serve as personal assistants. "Hopefully the robots won't take over, though. That would be terrifying."

One of the newest, and most controversial, experiments includes Amazon Key, a service that allows couriers to enter homes to drop off packages. If successful, it could eradicate package theft. If unsuccessful, it could erode consumer trust in Amazon's business.

Ring's camera-equipped doorbells could give hesitant Amazon shoppers some reassurance in letting strangers open their doors.

"This shows how serious Amazon is about privacy and security," said Michael Pachter, an analyst for Wedbush, who thinks Ring will give Amazon a jumping-off point to expand even further into home security.

"With Ring, you can set camera zones," Pachter added. "You can pull it up on your phone, trigger a light, and see what your camera sees. There's no reason why it can't trigger an alarm, too."

Siminoff came up with the idea for a video-enabled doorbell after he realized he couldn't hear his front door ring while brainstorming business ideas inside the garage of his Pacific Palisades home.

Despite the "Shark Tank" setback, his TV appearance in November 2013 sparked an uptick in sales, giving the company new life.

"Nothing ever will supersede 'Shark Tank.' We'd have been gone," Siminoff told The Times last year.

Ring has raised more than $200 million in funding and counts Richard Branson among its investors. The company also has received capital from Amazon's Alexa Fund, which invests in companies developing voice-enabled technology.

Siminoff has said that he works "very closely" with Amazon, but was wary of the company because of its size and influence.

"To say Amazon will not compete with you is lunacy because they compete with everybody," he said in a previous CNBC interview. "They're like nuclear power. They are very, very powerful and you can get amazing, clean energy from them, but there's also the possibility of getting human radiation if you're not careful."

Ring's sale marks the biggest exit for an L.A.-area startup since Unilever bought Dollar Shave Club for $1 billion in 2016. At least three local venture capital firms have invested in Ring: Upfront Ventures, QueensBridge Venture Partners and VTF.

A spokesperson for Ring said the company employed 2,000 "team members," but did not clarify how many were full-time workers. The company had 2 million customers and sales of $160 million in 2016, according to IHS Markit.

The acquisition of Ring also gives Amazon more ammunition to take on rival Google, which is expanding into video doorbells with its line of smart home hardware called Nest.

Amazon faces the risk of confusing consumers now that it has so many overlapping products, analysts say.

The tech giant already offers a smart camera called Cloud Cam, which is used for Amazon Key. And it acquired smart camera and doorbell startup Blink in December.

"It's like here's this widget, here's that widget," said Frank Gillett, an analyst with Forrester. "Confusion would not be surprising given they've just run out and bought a bunch of companies. That's the mess they're headed into."

Amazon will have to figure out whether it wants to continue partnering with different companies or consolidate the services its hardware provides, Gillett said.

Neither Ring nor Amazon would discuss the terms of the deal. Reuters, citing an unidentified source familiar with the matter, reported that the price is more than $1 billion.

It would mark Amazon's second-biggest acquisition after the nearly $14 billion purchase of Whole Foods in June.

"We'll be able to achieve even more by partnering with an inventive, customer-centric company like Amazon," Ring said in a statement. "We look forward to being a part of the Amazon team as we work toward our vision for safer neighborhoods."

"Ring's home security products and services have delighted customers since Day 1," Amazon said in a statement. "We're excited to work with this talented team and help them in their mission to keep homes safe and secure."

Times staff writer Alejandra Reyes-Velarde contributed to this report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me