ShareThis Page

Astrobotic wins NASA contract to continue work on small lunar CubeRover

Aaron Aupperlee
| Tuesday, March 13, 2018, 2:40 p.m.
An artist interpretation of the Astrobotic Peregrine Lunar Lander with CubeRover.
An artist interpretation of the Astrobotic Peregrine Lunar Lander with CubeRover.

Astrobotic won a $750,000 contract from NASA to continue developing a small lunar rover.

The Pittsburgh-based space delivery company will continue to work closely with Carnegie Mellon University on developing the CubeRover.

The rovers could drive down the cost of exploration on the lunar and Martian surfaces and open both up to more scientific, commercial missions.

“CubeRover stands to give more people access to the Moon than ever before,” Andrew Horchler, head of the program at Astrobotic, said in a statement. “Countries and organizations without multi-billion-dollar budgets now have a means of exploring other worlds for the first time.”

NASA's Curiosity Rover, which landed on Mars in 2012, weighed about as much as a car and cost about $2.5 billion. The Martian rovers Spirit and Opportunity weighed about as much as a golf cart and cost $400 million apiece.

Astrobotic's CubeRover would weigh less than five pounds and fit into a small cube aboard a lunar lander. The rover would then unfold itself from the cube and explore the surface. Astrobotic hopes to send its first CubeRover to the Moon abroad the maiden voyage of its Peregrine lander in 2020.

CMU's Planetary Robotics Lab designed a 10-kilogram CubeRover in 2015. The lab has also built an 8-kilogram rover, a 6-kilogram prototype and developed designs for a 4-kilogram model.

Astrobotic received $125,000 from NASA in May to begin work with CMU on the CubeRover. The additional $750,000 will fund work for the next two years to develop a flight-ready rover for NASA.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at, 412-336-8448 or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me