FaceApp lets you look older but prompts safety concerns | TribLIVE.com

FaceApp lets you look older but prompts safety concerns

Emily Balser

If you’ve ever wondered what you’ll look like when you’re older, you’re in luck.

There’s an app for that.

FaceApp, which first hit the tech scene about two years ago, has resurfaced this week and gone viral again after a new feature was added that allows you to age yourself to look older and younger.

The new feature has created a “challenge” people are participating in and posting their aging photos on social media.

Even Pittsburghers have participated, including the Steelers.

Lots of celebrities also go in on the challenge, many poking fun at themselves.

View this post on Instagram

Best caption wins ovo tickets

A post shared by champagnepapi (@champagnepapi) on

While many people are just having some fun by participating in the challenge, some people are questioning the safety of it. FaceApp is a Russia startup with the core of its R&D team based in Russia but the company’s founder told Tech Crunch that no user data is transferred to Russia and that the app uses Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud for its cloud processing.

Tech Crunch also points out that some users are concerned about whether the app accesses and uploads your camera roll to its server. They reported they found no evidence of this and neither did security researchers.

But users should be cautious about including sensitive information, like banking information, in any of the photos used in the app. With a scraper and optical character recognition tech, someone could glean huge amounts of information beyond just photos.

Experts in each report caution users to be extra vigilant about the apps they use and the permission hey give those apps if they have concerns over privacy.

Categories: Business | Technology
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.