Loss of old Myspace artifacts highlights impermanence of the Web | TribLIVE.com

Loss of old Myspace artifacts highlights impermanence of the Web

The Washington Post

The most surprising thing people may learn about Myspace this week is that it still exists. But the old social network’s accidental purge of 12 years’ worth of its users’ music uploads – that’s an estimated 50 million songs – is probably a close second.

The tremendous loss of digital artifacts, such as the Flickr photo annihilation, the Tumblr porn purge and the coming Google+ disintegration, highlights the impermanence of the Web, and the ease with which files and posts that helped define Internet culture and history can be so readily discarded.

In the case of Myspace, the loss of the uploads appears accidental. “As a result of a server migration project, any photos, videos and audio files you uploaded more than three years ago may no longer be available on or from Myspace,” the company said in a statement. “We apologize for the inconvenience.”

But in other prominent examples of disposed Web content, the deletions and bans were and will be intentional.

Google decided to shutter its social network after a security flaw compromised hundreds of thousands of accounts, potentially exposing the personal information of its users. Google+ users were given 10 months to download and move their data ahead of the site’s planned shutdown in April.

In December, Tumblr gave only two weeks’ notice of its intent to ban all explicit adult content and nudity from its website. Last month, in Flickr’s most recent update, the photo storage site announced that any files uploaded beyond the 1,000-item threshold for free accounts risked deletion.

Taken together, the bans, purges and deletions of years’ worth of online material represent a loss that’s hard to absorb – blending the disappearance of intangible artifacts, art, music, communities and novel forms of communication.

Some archiving experts see the Myspace episode as another sign of the risk of relying on Internet platforms to host people’s cherished content. As Vox reported, the Internet Archive’s Jason Scott sees Myspace as a harbinger of things to come. “Anyone who doesn’t think this is going to happen with YouTube is kidding themselves,” he said recently on Twitter. Scott criticized both Myspace’s handling of its now lost files, and Google’s decision to shut down Google+.

Myspace and Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Before it was sold and resold, Los Angeles-based Myspace was a popular, pioneering social network before Facebook swelled into the juggernaut of the web. The lost files had been uploaded from 2003 – the year of the company’s birth – to 2015, representing more than 50 million songs by 14 million artists.

In response to the shuttering of Google+, the nonprofit Internet Archive and a collection of archivists, programmers and writers known as the Archive Team announced an effort earlier this month to preserve public posts on the social network before they are shuttered in April.

Categories: Business | Technology
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.