Survey: Younger drivers can identify emojis, not car dashboard alert | TribLIVE.com
Technology

Survey: Younger drivers can identify emojis, not car dashboard alert

Frank Carnevale
643903_web1_ptr-TPMS-symbol-011719
Millennials and Gen Zers are 1.5 times more likely to identify popular emojis correctly than the tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) warning symbol, according to the survey commissioned by Goodyear Auto Service and Just Tires.
643903_web1_ptr-TPMS-symbol-02-011719
Millennials and Gen Zers are 1.5 times more likely to identify popular emojis correctly than the tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) warning symbol, according to the survey commissioned by Goodyear Auto Service and Just Tires.

Younger drivers can identify emojis, but a common car dashboard alert throws them, according to a new survey.

Millennials and Gen Zers are 1.5 times more likely to identify popular emojis correctly than the tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) warning symbol, according to the survey commissioned by Goodyear Auto Service and Just Tires.

Actually many drivers couldn’t identify the symbol. The survey found 49 percent of young driver and 39 percent of overall drivers were unable to recognize the TPMS warning symbol, which alerts drivers that one or more tires are under-inflated. The TPMS alert is standard on all 2008 and newer car, truck and SUV models.

The survey talked to over 1,000 people in October, they were over 18 years old and possessed a driver’s license.

Goodyear says that possible causes for the TPMS light include a tire puncture, a leaking tire and fluctuating temperatures.


Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Frank at 412-380-8511, [email protected] or via Twitter @frnkstar.


Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: Business | Technology
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.