Why Wikipedia will go offline for 24 hours in Germany | TribLIVE.com
Technology

Why Wikipedia will go offline for 24 hours in Germany

The Washington Post
880814_web1_WikipediaScreen

BERLIN — Online encyclopedia Wikipedia’s German edition will go offline for 24 hours next Thursday as its authors try to rally Europeans against a proposed European Union law that would tighten online copyright regulations. Critics fear that the directive could pose risks to freedom of speech in Europe.

If E.U. lawmakers pass the controversial measure this spring, major content-sharing platforms such as Facebook and Twitter would be liable for their users’ copyright violations. To avoid fines, platforms are likely to install so-called upload filters that would check all content for possible violations using automatic software. The technology would be similar to mechanisms already in place on YouTube, where uploaded videos are automatically checked for music copyright violations, and on Facebook, where algorithms detect nude content.

While the proposed E.U. directive is being backed by a number of artists’ associations and publishing companies, its critics fear that “upload filters” would disrupt free discourse online. Political debates on Twitter and Facebook often include the use of memes or GIFs, for instance, which may be deemed copyright infringements under the new rules.

Theoretically, the E.U. rules would protect the use of copyright-protected footage if it was only quoted, reviewed or caricatured, for example.

But in practice, automatic algorithms are unable to make that call.

“Misplaced confidence in filtering technologies to make nuanced distinctions between copyright violations and legitimate uses of protected material would escalate the risk of error and censorship,” said David Kaye, the U.N. special rapporteur on freedom of expression.

He also argued that the upload filter “appears destined to drive Internet platforms toward monitoring and restriction of user-generated content even at the point of upload. Such sweeping pressure for pre-publication filtering is neither a necessary nor proportionate response to copyright infringement online.”

The use of automatic filters would also put a financial strain on smaller platforms, even though the current directive would not affect most start-ups. Wikipedia and other major sites, however, fear that the European Union’s copyright initiative might end up making the Internet even more dominated by companies such as Google and Facebook – even though reining in their power has long been a declared goal of E.U. regulators.

Categories: Business | Technology
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.