ShareThis Page
Overachiever son ditches fast track after college | TribLIVE.com
More Lifestyles

Overachiever son ditches fast track after college

Carolyn Hax
| Monday, February 11, 2019 10:30 p.m
729820_web1_gtr-LIV-hax

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn:

My son, “Ron,” 27, works part time at a low-pressure, low-paying job. He has a four-year college degree my ex-wife and I paid for and he graduated with honors but has never worked in that field and shows no interest in doing so. I thought we had raised him to have a strong work ethic. He lives independently because his well-employed girlfriend, “Ann,” pays most of their bills. When he visits, I do occasionally have to give him some gas or spending money, but it’s not much.

My wife is very concerned that if he and Ann broke up, he’d have to move in with us or his mother, and thinks it’s time for a serious father/son talk. I trust that we raised him right and he’ll eventually find his direction in life. And not everyone needs to be a CEO, right? Should I talk with him or not?

— Parent

Not. Not your business.

And certainly not his stepmother’s. Her worst-case scenario hasn’t even happened — and she can avoid it just by saying “no.”

Re: Ron:

What about ending the practice of giving him gas and spending money? You can decline to be an enabler in even a small way, right?

— Just a Suggestion

Significant money, then it’s time for a talk. If it’s peanuts, I think there’s actually more to gain by not shaming him; seeking 20 bucks for gas is quite obviously not a good look on an educated and capable 27-year-old not otherwise under duress, so why say it out loud. A parent’s choice not to bust chops can be a gift as opposed to a parenting lapse. So it’s complicated.

Re: Ron:

If Ron and Ann are happy, then “house-husband” with a side gig in a job of his own choosing is a perfectly valid choice. How does that not equate to a “strong work ethic”? I consider it antiquated thinking that someone with a four-year degree must be on a career path or it was all a waste.

— Perfectly Valid

Amen.

Re: Ron:

I was all set to go off with my high GPA and four-year degree and Be Successful in Life. But I did a 180 and went into a creative field for less money, and I have no regrets.

Still, every time I see my dad he feels the need to have the “we really expect more from you” heart-to-heart. And you know what that’s done? Nothing. I still live my life my way. And my dad wonders why they see less of me.

— No Regrets

Thanks so much for this.

The life of an ambition-track kid (leadership! sports! college!) is now so structured and front-loaded with grades and activities and programs and scores and oh-my-sweet-baby-deity the Expectaaaations! — and the ambient culture is either demanding or judging excellence, or it’s snarking about participation trophies and safe spaces. So if a highly decorated current young adult is in the midst of a crisis of the Point of It All, then welcome to the freaking club.

Therefore, in this scenario, it’s a bit rich for the probable source of such pressure to be mystified as to its lingering effects.

Not that this explains Ron, just that it’s a phenomenon reaching its prime.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook or chat with her online at noon each Friday at washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.