ShareThis Page
Should kids be forced to call adults by their honorific? | TribLIVE.com
More Lifestyles

Should kids be forced to call adults by their honorific?

Carolyn Hax
| Wednesday, February 13, 2019 12:45 p.m
739602_web1_gtr-LIV-hax

Dear Carolyn:

I hate honorifics for myself and want to be called by my first name, period. Some kids in my life have parents who say they HAVE to call me Ms. Lastname or at least Ms. Firstname. They insist it’s important to them that their kids “show respect.” I keep telling them the best way their kids can show respect is by respecting what people want to be called! The parents get really upset when I tell the kids, “Please just call me Firstname.” We are at an impasse.

— Name

I admire everyone’s passion. I guess.

If you were all my little Lego people and I were running your world, both sides would have backed down and said, “Whatever,” because — whatever.

Names are certainly significant and worthy of respect as elements of identity.

But in this case, you’re not trolling each other or taking disingenuous, political jabs at name choices. Both of you have made and stood by valid, well-meaning points that ably express who you are and what you believe in. You are living your truth on individuality, good for you; they are living their truth on responsibility, both parental and societal. Good for them.

So I find myself wishing both parties would recognize the integrity and goodwill of the other — and therefore the relative unimportance of a win or loss on the specific expression of said values — and just drop it. These kids can call you Firstname without their entire societal education caving in on itself. And your being called Ms. Firstname by one set of kids won’t scald you like holy water on a vampire.

Then the kids will turn 18, game over.

Since I’m talking to you, not these parents, you’re the designated dropper: Defer to them in the name of friendship, and if that’s not persuasive, then bigger-fish-to-fryship will do.

Dear Carolyn:

I got engaged nine months ago, and we settled on a very small wedding/elopement.

My family is NOT happy. I keep reiterating that this is what I want to do and stating my reasons — money, not having to pick and choose family, introvert who doesn’t want to be the center of attention, more attention paid to the marriage and not the wedding — but I can’t seem to get through to them that this is non-negotiable. I have said they can help in other ways, like help me pick out where to go, what I’m wearing, etc., though with no money involved.

How do I get them to understand? Everything online comes down to, “Offer that the insisting person can pay for the extras they want,” but my family would happily pay to throw a huge shebang, which sounds like a nightmare.

— K.

If it’s non-negotiable, then stop negotiating.

That’s what all your explaining sounds like, I promise you.

Wanting them to understand no doubt seems like a reasonable goal — but they’ve rejected your explanations and refused to budge. So, budging them is not a reasonable goal.

Fortunately, you don’t need them to understand. It would be great if they did, but not necessary. You can get fully married without it.

So, do that — stop explaining yourself and get married your way. To all complaints: “I’m sorry to hear that.” To any threats: “I hope you’ll reconsider.” To your intended: “I do.”

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook or chat with her online at noon each Friday at washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.