ShareThis Page

Deer Lakes School District rejects tentative budget with tax increase

| Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 10:15 p.m.

District property owners likely won't be facing a tax hike next school year.

The school board rejected a proposed preliminary $31.6 million spending plan for 2012-13 that included a 0.55-mill tax increase. The increase had been suggested to help cover $500,000 in debt payments that will begin in 2014-15.

When the school board refinanced debt earlier this year, the agreement reduced annual payments for two years, said Business Manager John Zenone.

State law limits how much school boards can raise taxes each year, so Zenone is pushing for about a half-mill tax hike both this year and next year to bring in enough revenue to cover the debt service payments. One mill brings in about $660,000, he said.

"I'm trying to ask them to look down the road and set the millage," he said.

A tax increase would mean about a $45 to $49 tax increase per household, Zenone said.

Board members also voted against the tax increase in January.

Zenone said at this point it would be unlikely that the board would pass a budget with a tax increase.

"I understand we're in very difficult financial times," school board President Lisa Merlo said.

District officials still have to figure out where the money to cover debt payments will come from.

The district plans on using Public Financial Management to help review revenues and expenses in preparation for next school year's budget and future debt payment.

Officials have until June 30 to pass a budget.

Other business

Curtisville Primary Center Principal Christopher Brough is voluntarily returning to a teaching position.

His new status as a teacher will go into effect July 1.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me