ShareThis Page

Gilpin woman assaulted outside nursing home

Chuck Biedka
| Thursday, April 26, 2012, 1:14 a.m.

An ex-boyfriend allegedly used a ball bat to assault a 22-year-old Gilpin woman on Tuesday night outside a nursing home where she works, police said.

Harmar police on Wednesday arrested Kevin Maurice McCallum, 39, whose last known addresses were in Tarentum, Arnold, New Kensington and Evergreen Road, Gilpin, according to court records.

He is being held in the Allegheny County Jail on charges of aggravated and simple assault, reckless endangerment and possession of an instrument of crime, court records show.

Harmar police could not be reached for comment.

Police said the victim is a nursing assistant at Harmar Village Care Center off Freeport Road. She was on a break, standing with two other employees in a smoking area at the facility in the 700 block of Freeport Road.

Police Chief Jason Domaratz said the trio were preparing to go back inside shortly before 11:30 p.m. when the one-time boyfriend, who was dressed in all black, came up to them.

"He hit her in the face, hands, arms and legs," Domaratz said.

The victim was taken to UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh.

A condition wasn't available there yesterday, but police said they have been told the victim was being treated for head injuries, a shattered knee cap and broken arm.

Harmar Village administrator Greg Hall confirmed the victim has been an employee for "several years."

The incident didn't directly involve the facility and there was no risk to anyone in Harmar Village Care Center, he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me