ShareThis Page

Grant to help set up 'health care district' in Greensburg

| Monday, May 14, 2012, 11:11 p.m.

Greensburg City Council approved acceptance of a $30,000 state grant on Monday to help set up a "health care district" around Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital.

During a meeting last night, council endorsed receipt of the funds from the state Department of Community and Economic Development.

Council wants to spark development around the city hospital and make that development easier to do by setting up the district.

Experts will look at parking, pedestrian walkways, roads and other items.

In addition, the "health care district" designation would shorten the zoning process for any development Excela does near its facility.

The city's share in setting up the district will be $5,000. Greensburg Community Development Corp. is chipping in $10,000 of the total $120,000 cost.

City officials hope to make up the funding difference through grants and foundation money.

In another matter, during the fall election campaign, candidates for Greensburg mayor and council professed the need to revise the city's building-code requirements.

Last night, Councilman Randy Finfrock, director of administration, development and public operations, told council he wants to begin reviewing those building restrictions.

Finfrock said he hopes to start the review at council's June 5 meeting.

"We've been kind of doing this in fits and starts," he said, adding he wanted to announce intentions now so the work gets done.

Council accepted the retirement of police Sgt. Gerald Stofko, a 20-year member of the department, effective May 26.

The panel further endorsed buying a chassis for Greensburg Fire Department Hose Company No. 8's salvage truck. City officials are making the $75,662 purchase through the state's COSTARS purchasing program and will fund it through the city's fire improvement fund.

The equipment is specialized, Councilman Bill Eger said, making use of a second-hand chassis nearly impossible.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me